Based muslim child

Was expecting more of an Egyptian punchline.

Like Mummy, right? Same
- Would the plural even be mummies? I don't know but I had to re-read because my dumb brain already went there when I got to the end.

Actually just has dead, wrapped up Egyptians in his basement.

I know a decent amount of weird historical facts to know that the looted corpses are usually stored in the attic in Europe. There is also a non zero chance that if you live in an old enough house in Europe there could still be a corpse in the attic.
- Welcome to the Aitre St Maclou in Rouen! The cemetery was full in the XVIth century, so they built a nice building to keep the old corpses on the upper floors, all windows opened to everything can be nicely ventilated. 200 years later, they turned it into a school.
For when he gets snacky

this really happened SOURCE: me, Albert Einstein who is also clapping

Nothing ever happens
- Ehrm, some right winger said it on twitter, it's here black and white.
- It would be pretty weird for a teacher to get excited that a child doesn't hate their moms

People don't want to talk about this, but lesbianism is common in polygamy.

I would like to know more, as people don't want to talk about it.
- Do you want to know more just because people don't want to talk about it?
Not in a Muslim household it ain't.

Is the main objection to polygamy that having multiple sex partners is immoral or that the whole arrangement is subjugation of women (because usually it's multiple wives not husbands), or some other reason?

Muslim men can have multiple wives (maximum 5 I believe) as long as they can provide for them. Muslim women are only allowed to have a single husband.
The joke is that the school thought that the kid’s family was super progressive meanwhile in reality it was super patriarchal
- Thanks, I got the humor, what I'm wondering about is what's the predominant reason people in general object to polygamy, regardless of whether it's Islam or Mormons or whatever.
Probably depends on who you ask. I'm polyamorous and I think in almost all cases where someone says polygamy and not polyamory they're engaging in an immoral power dynamic. My experience being poly though I'd say most people take offense to the multiple partners thing and polygamy is just what they're familiar with as a concept
- This. When I was poly my friends and fam were cool with it, but they're not religious. Every religious person I knew who found out was not too pleased with me.
Find me just one example of a Muslim woman with two husbands.
- That wasn't the ask though? They were asking about polygamy in general...
- If everyone involved consents, should that be anyone else's business?
- Excuse me? If you want one find her yourself.
A bit of both. The Greeks and Romans had a cultural taboo against polygamy which Christianity inherited, which means that Christians have historically been opposed to polygamy (which was not the case in Pre-christian northern Europe) on moral grounds. There is also the issue that historically polygamy has been associated with patriarchal societies in which men are allowed or expected to have multiple wives, but women are not allowed to do the same. Additionally, it is also culturally associated with treating women as property of the husband. Personally I don't have any issue with polygamy if everyone is free to do whatever but the way most cultures practice it, it's unfair to women. Then again, that could also he said of "traditional" marriage in a lot of monogamous scenarios too.
- These days there is also a tax reason why you can't marry multiple people. It would have a fair amount of tax negatives as well.
- "one to cook and one to clean" is one of the "joke-y" sayings I heard
Depends on whose objecting. This arrangement pretty much only works at scale with a combination of religious brainwashing, inequality between and amongst the genders, and a healthy dose of male mortality especially from war.
Inequality among a gender: For instance if bob and Sam both make 70k 5 women aren't all marrying one or the other in most instances.
Inequality between the genders: Given a complex life path beyond follow in husband's shadow no matter what or become a parish the chance of instability with more people increases with each member added.
So the first obvious person to object to broad enactment of this idea ought to be women raised to buy into this when it's not their best option.
Next is society for such groups brainwashing kids.
Then there is the downside of the enabling inequality. Anyone not on the top end of the financial spectrum ought to object to that.
Women ought to object to the idea that they ought to share.
Men not in the top 5-20% ought to object to competing for the remaining women not attached to high status males. Note this is what incels say they are mad about now but there is so much to unpack re their broken brains and it's just not at this juncture real.
Society should be mad at the very large number of unattached men who normally cause trouble.
Some such societies deal with this by trading women like Pokemon cards and driving off excess men. This doesn't work without wars to kill them off or somewhere to drive them to.
Basically everyone but a smallish minority of men would be worse off which is why this is non existent in modern functioning society.
There little net effect on society with a small incidence of polygomy just like with lead in the water.
I think in western culture it might be a bit of both, and also a bit of xenophobia - it's different, so it must be bad. I'd be interested in knowing more too. Very good question.
- Mormons used to (some still do) practice polygamy and we had just as much, if not more of a problem with their practices as we do with "foreigners".
  From my perspective as another polyamorous person, I think polygamy is kinda fucked up, at least in the ways it manifests today. It's an inequitable power dynamic that relies on the exploitation of women. I'm all about subversion and defiance of hierarchies. Polygamy reinforces those hierarchies
If someone supports gay marriage they have no basis for opposing polygamist or incestuous marriages outside of how it subjectively makes them feel. Marriage is historically a religio-cultural institution. Without that context there can be no restrictions that don't also violate foundational secular values such as personal freedom. Secularity and modernism gatekeeping marriage is a hilarious mental gymnastics routine. These days marriage is just something to keep lawyers in business anyway. The government should just get out of the marriage business entirely at this point.
- You can oppose both polygamist or incestuous marriage if it's in a context of religious and sexist oppression, which tend to be the case in most instances of those two types of marriages.
  I wouldn't have complains about polyamory incestuous marriage of free people. But sadly most of practical cases are not like that.
- I generally agree with you, but I've heard reasonable arguments like
  polygamy is patriarchy, gay marriage isn't
  incest is bad for the gene pool, gay marriage isn't
  These raise their own questions of how to dismantle patriarchy, or if governments should have a say in our genes, etc. But I don't think they're equivalent discussions.

based and hallalpilled

This guy is pledging allegiance to two different cryptocurrency projects that are pretty much natural enemies and it's confusing

Most cryptobros don't give a shit about the moral or ethical implications of what crypto they invest in, what they represent, etc. They just want line go up. No different than investors who invest in diverse ranges of companies. Hedge funds will invest in fossil fuel giants right alongside ecotech startups. The only thing that matters is return.
- Hooray for non-tribalism?

If this wasn't posted by a right winger farming anti lgbt sentiment I'd probably cringe at the school being excited to parade the kid around for being accepting of lgbt people.

I hope Islam gets slept by JDM so I can laugh at people like this guy.

The Japanese domestic market?
- Jeffrey Dahmer Meats, (Inc.)?
- Good to know I wasn't the only one to think the same.
- Nah mate, Jack Della Maddalena obviously. He's gonna stuff the takedowns and piece islam up on the feet.

Two wives?

That must be unbearable.

That must be unbearable.
Obviously. That's clearly two women who didn't choose the bear.
- Marriage is punishment for shoplifting in some countries. This guy must have been really badly-behaved.

Old and fake

Ok?
- No need to thanks me

Once in Malaysia I met a guy who was in his early twenties. He looked perfectly ordinary from a western perspective, but it turned out he had three wives. Different cultures!

What is a guy with 3 wives supposed to look like?
- They have 3 dicks and 4 arms usually
- I knew a guy who - about 20 years ago, slept with both women in a lesbian relationship. As in - they cheated on each other with him. And somehow they formed a workable triad out of that that was pretty darn stable for like 10 years. Until he got caught cheating on them (after months, apparently) with someone in their social group - a younger, monogamous, ‘party girl’-type woman.
  He didn’t want to break up with anyone, and all of them refused to ‘give up’ so now (10 years after cheating) he has two relationships - the triad, the “new” one, two houses, and now a kid with each woman.
  He looks and acts sort of like a grown up version of Max from A Goofy Movie (Goofy’s son), is still ‘fixing’ the muscle car he bought in his college years, and has a 99% complete collection of every edition of Playboy magazine.
  But to answer your question of what a guy with 3 (or more) wives should look like? Bill Paxton, circa 2011.
- If he’s getting sex; very tired with a smile on his face.
What exactly are you saying here? Getting
"bUt yOu LoOk nORmaL hOW CaN yOU be gAy"
vibes from this.
- I'm saying my first impression wasn't "I bet this guy has three wives". I suggest you take a nap.

i think polygamy is ok if it's K₃ romantic