Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
42
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • For Signal, they will know when and how often you receive Signal messages.

    Notifications are used to "activate" the app on your device. Then it will connect to Signal servers and download the encrypted messages.

    After the software on your device decrypted the message, then it has the sender details and message content.

    There are settings to control how much of that information is used when creating the local notification. Because other apps might log notifications.

    @jackalope
    @L4s

  • That's terrifying for showing how little he understands about the problem he is attempting to solve.

    Humans use up to four senses at times to accomplish the task of driving.

    @mosiacmango
    @cm0002

  • How do they manage to make the same messages appear on multiple devices?

    For a long time, they didn't.

    I don't know for sure, but I expect it involves keys that multiple devices share. Any "linked" device would be able to download the encrypted copy and decrypt the message that way. Once any device has done that, it can send a copy to any other devices using the unique keys it knows for that device.

    This link describes independent queues for devices: https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/5532268300186-Disappearing-Messages-with-a-Linked-Device

    @MacNCheezus

  • Signal stores all your messages and media as well, the difference is they encrypt it on their servers.

    What evidence do you have to support this claim?

    The last time I looked into this, messages and media were only stored encrypted on servers until they were retrieved or expired.

    After that, the local device is where things are stored.

    @MacNCheezus

  • Eventually, the list of things Samsung doesn't make is going to be shorter.

    @Reverendender

  • Why don't you ask the Matrix team why they decided to re-invent XMPP and add a stupid HTTP API?

    @onlinepersona
    @netchami

  • Don't negotiate with or give in to terrorists!

    @ohlaph

  • It's both amazing and annoying that Google is perfectly able to create useful apps for iOS (despite the huge limitations the OS imposes) but Apple can't figure out how to make any Android app that isn't utter crap with fewer restrictions imposed on them.

    @d3Xt3r
    @hesusingthespiritbomb

  • Installing from F-Droid prevents sales like this from causing silent "upgrades" to advertising-infested versions.

    @kpw

  • Accessing the keys from the server isn't really a mystery or hidden. It's technically possible for Apple to write software to query servers run by Google as well as any servers they created for themselves.

    You don't need implementation source code when you have open standards already.

    WhatsApp actually used Signal's development team to rollout the Signal protocol for them, but that app is still untrustworthy.

    @skullgiver

  • I would argue that bad experiences aren’t due to trains but due to poor investment and management.

    I agree. I used trains to get to school as a commuter.

    Nothing makes a train more unusable than not knowing when it will arrive at the destination (it was sometimes hours late) or if it will show up at all (the schedule was constantly changing, and some trains would just be cancelled when equipment was broken).

    @luthis @scarabic

  • Google and Samsung were the only apps to implement RCS (and the infrastructure to support the app) so far.

    Nothing Google has done prevents any other organizations that want to invest the time and money from also implementing the standard.

    https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/rcs/universal-profile/

    Apple, on the other hand, doesn't allow iMessage apps or servers that they didn't create themselves. Or even an SMS/RCS app on their devices.

    @NENathaniel