Why do people switch from chrome to Brave browser and not to Firefox?

Well reading comments here has me going to download Vivaldi to replace Brave.

Thank y'all!

How vivaldi isn't more popular with tech users that want to use chromium totally eludes me. The browser is super moddeable and the devs have so far been nothing but super open and correct to their community. I don't think there's been a single vivaldi "scandal" of note. It literally opera before that went down the drain, and is a better browser on top.
The whole "it's not open source" mantra has also been thoroughly addressed.
Also don't get me started on the brave love. It feels astroturfed. I do not get how you can genuinely shill that browser...
You literally ignored the whole comment section, you madlad.

Brave falls under "security theatre" and is absolutely useless

And run by a homophobic crypto bro.
- Who also inflicted Javascript upon the world, the incompetent piece of shit.
  I won't say that's worse than the homophobia because I don't want to seem dismissive about oppression of queer folks, but it sure as Hell isn't better, either!
- Source(s) for this?

I can't answer that question but I've always wondered why anyone switches to Brave. I installed it a few years ago because I heard it was privacy focused and it immediately hit me with a bunch of shit about crypto and rewards or something. I uninstalled it immediately.

It does respect your privacy but it comes with bloatware. You can actually remove them pretty easily
- "Respect" for you as the user means you shouldn't have to do stuff like that in the first place.
I installed it. Crypto stuff is off by default. Ad blocking built in. Multiple 3rd party testing shows it blocks virtually all tracking/fingerprinting.
Firefox/Chrome - you need all kinds of addons and pihole type setups to do the same thing. God forbid you want to use it off your own network, you need additional tools. All these tools break with updates, whether they are the browsers or addons/tools themselves. Brave has never once broken its adblock/privacy settings in the years I've used it.
Most of us on here are privacy focused, and want the average user to be that way too. Brave is a one click setup, nothing else needed solution. Is it perfect? Hell no. Is the owner a piece of shit? Hell yes. Does it allow the average user to take ownership of their privacy in an easy and non-technical way? Yes. Perfect is the enemy of good. I will gladly jump ship once another turnkey solution comes along that is as easy and privacy centric that Brave is.
- Firefox/Chrome - you need all kinds of addons and pihole type setups to do the same thing.
  bullshit
  you need a single addon, ublock origin. enable additional builtin blocklists according to taste.
  you can have additional addons for additional functionality. does brave have libredirect built in? does it block and redirect google AMP sites by default? does it have a feature to only delete cookies regularly for specific sites?
  and let's not forget the elephant in the room: ublock is not working anymore in chrome! google made it so that you can only use the inferior lite version, that can only load much much fewer filtering rules into the browser.
  I don't know if brave kept supporting mv2 extensions, but if they do, I guarantee to you that it won't be that way for long. it has been relatively easy sailing so far because google did not actually remove support, but it will be lots of work when finally google does remove it, and they'll be needing to patch it in for every new version
  pihole is not used for firefox, and that's never been its use case. It's for everything else that uses the internet, but cannot have something like ublock origin: various software, windows itself, android and apps there, smart home and iot garbage.
  Honestly this statement of yours proves to me that you don't know what you're talking about.
  All these tools break with updates, whether they are the browsers or addons/tools themselves.
  I have no idea what you are talking about. anyone else?
I tried to install Brave and it almost nuked my PC. Completely jammed up. I uninstalled it immediately.
- Yeah so true!! I installed it, and it launched an attack to overheat and destroy my CPU. Thankfully I reacted quick enough, and unplugged my computer quickly. However when I turned it back on, all my files were gone. It was cryptomining without my consent. Absolutely crazy!

I wanted to try Brave a couple of years ago. I ran the installer, and it was one of those pieces of shit installers that just goes ahead and installs without any input from the user, dumping god knows what onto your system, and it puts everything in some obscure AppData subdirectory that can't be deduced without right-clicking the desktop shortcut. I uninstalled it without even launching it once.

If a user is 50/50 on whether or not they just installed malware, you might wanna check your programming practices.

SCNR if they were able to make good decisions, they would never have switched to chrome anyway. /s

tbh, i don't get all the mozilla/firefox hate. even "the linux project" missed the mark by a mile with his firefox critique.

whatever mozilla does, it's not even half as evil as google

We learned that from politics in general. Vote for the lesser evil, not for the optimal choice, as there is none, sadly.

Firefox is my main browser but there's a few specific things that only work in chromium.
People will use whatever works for them.

Other than MS Teams, which is garbage by default, I have yet to find anything that's not working in Firefox.
- The only times I've ever run into stuff not working were:
  The GrapheneOS installer bc it uses web USB
  Sites that decide Firefox isn't good enough (glares at Pearson), though I just use a user agent switcher and suddenly the site works
I run 2 browsers as well, with about 90% of my use on Firefox
I have found that simply being willing to use multiple browsers solves a lot of problems for me

I've always preferred to choose from the options offered by my Distro's repository. I might not install that -exact- version (prefer to install where I can easily back things up).

I tried out Firefox on my phone a year or two ago. I had a number of issues, including accessing secure pages for work. I have little doubt that it wasn't Firefox at fault so much as it was narrow testing by website developers, but the end result was problems for me regardless of who was at fault, so I switched back to Chrome.

I have Brave alongside my Librewolf installation because of Chromecast. Yes, II know, crazy to have Google shit in your house but it just works and I at least have TechnitiumDNS.

I want to use the same browser on desktop and mobile, but Firefox doesn’t support ad-blocking on iOS.

This doesn’t solve your same browser issue, but just fyi the browser “Orion” on iOS supports full browser extensions. Its developed by the company that runs the Kagi search engine
Maybe the problem is not Firefox here, but Apple.
Apple does not allow other browsers than Safari on iOS. All other browsers are just reskins of Safari.
- The problem is absolutely Apple but a guy’s still gotta block his ads somehow
I thought all browsers on iOS were just wrappers for the same engine (webkit?), so they really can't do much there.
- Yes but multiple browsers managed to support ad-block on iOS, including Safari.
  Firefox seems to be the ONLY browser without ad-block support on iOS.
Also simply compatibility, some sites just don't work (or dont work well) on Firefox or librewolf, thats one key reason I go back to brave for a lot of things.
- I genuinely have not seen a site that doesn't work on Firefox in years. Probably five or more. Can you think of an example off the top of your head?
- Name and shame them. Send them a complaint.
  Relatedly, does anyone know if there's a public list of sites that don't work (properly or at all) in Firefox somewhere? A quick (non-Google) web search doesn't seem to turn one up. If I was working at Mozilla, that would be the kind of database I might be interested in making a public resource. And I don't mean as part of the Bug Tracker, though links between the two for legitimate problems could be useful, I guess.
  Something with a very basic interface that has an offending site name, how it doesn't work, perhaps why, and what, if anything, Mozilla can do about it. In short simple sentences. One per offending site in 16pt text. And a search feature for when it runs to the hundreds.
  It could be something like: [favicon/logo] example.com - Outright states that it will not support Firefox. Mozilla cannot do anything about this. Complain to Example Inc. [favicon/logo] example.net - interface is buggy in Firefox. Site misuses web standards in a way incompatible with Firefox's renderer. We are looking into this.
  <Link to bug tracker here>
  [favicon/logo] example.org - interface does not load. Site uses non-standard Google-only CSS properties. We are looking into this, but you could also contact The Example Organisation to ask them to review their CSS. etc.
  I've not had any problems with the handful of sites I use, at least not outside of something caused by browser security or add-ons which I eventually figured out how to fix.
  That said, I've probably forgotten a handful I just straight up refused to visit again when they didn't work and now they're not in my regular rotation any more, so I don't notice.
- They won't make it compatible if they don't have Firefox users.
There are no ads in my Firefox. Is it because of DNS?
Conversely, no browser but Firefox supports ad blocking (and other) addons on Android.
- Brave, Vivaldi, Samsung Internet all support ad-blocking on Android, as far as I remember.

Because Brave is by default what Firefox is when you install Librewolf instead - and more. And you can refuse to see that and be wrong about it, I don't care. I use Librewolf because I want to, I still think it's not the better browser.

My Firefox is set up to more aggressively block sites from doing stuff and clear my cookies. I use Brave for when something breaks or if I want the site to track my preferences, like for YouTube.

Firefox still doesn't have tab groups on mobile

For me, it’s because I’m a web developer and most people use chrome. I have to run my code on a browser that is close to what people will really use. I have noticed a blind spot recently where I assumed another project I’m working on is similar, but that one I think has more Firefox users. Likely I’ll have to change my preference by project.

Also, hot take, Chromium is actually a very good browser aside from all google’s nonsense. I’ve had to turn to list virtualization to handle large lists of elements, but I noticed Chromium was much more forgiving of these lists compared to safari. Admittedly I need to do more Firefox testing.

I think people get too caught up on which browser is the best. Probably a good thing we have both brave and Firefox as options. I know brave has done its own share of nonsense, but it’s still miles better than chrome.

Don't you normally test in Firefox as well?
So why not use chromium then? Or Cromite. Both are more bare bones than brave and would give you a better view of what your audience will see.
- Honestly, mostly cause I’m busy. I’ve been using brave for years. I work 9-5. When I’m not working, I’m spending that time either on a side project or with friends or family. And it hasn’t bothered me enough yet to make the switch. Generally I like tinkering, but for some reason this specific thing hasn’t interested me much recently. I’d rather spend time customizing neovim lol.
  I also went down a browser fingerprinting rabbit whole a few years ago. It became pretty evident to me that the more I try to customize my browser experience, the more unique my fingerprint becomes. It’s impossible to avoid. Here a really interesting article on how you can be fingerprinted even without JavaScript.
  So I’m just trying to live my life. I see zero ads since using brave. I don’t have to think about some complex combination of browser extensions, because the built in ad blocking just works. I turned off all the obnoxious crypto stuff on day 1, and I haven’t seen any of it since.

Brave is more secure than Firefox, in terms of sandboxing capabilities that it inherits from chromium.
Brave includes a default adblocker and use their own search engine, compared to Firefox which does not have a default adblocker and uses Google as the default search engine.
Brave is more efficent in terms of CPU and GPU usage, while Firefox is more efficient in terms of Ram usage.
Brave is relatively stable(Not a lot of surprising changes) compared to Firefox.
Brave is better looking out of the box(Wallpapers, New Tab Page (NTP) Customization and built-in Themes).

I can't speak to Brave, but a lot of us have been burned by Firefox before.

And the minority that still uses FF is constantly reminded that Brave is a flaming dumpsterfire that pretends to be not on fire. Sure, FF occasionally did questionable things. Brave does them all the time.