For a group that considers .world to be Reddit 2.0 and a "CIA propaganda front" they seem to get awfully mad whenever it comes up
For a group that considers .world to be Reddit 2.0 and a "CIA propaganda front" they seem to get awfully mad whenever it comes up
On our own instance no less lmao
Inb4 YoU CaN jUsT bLOcK uSsSSs
Good lord, and any criticism of an authoritarian communist government and they expose just how much they love the taste of boots.
Okay, but debate pervert is really funny, though.
I’ve seen people banned with “liberal” being the reason.
Fallacy fallacy: only because it contains a fallacy (or a bunch) the argument isn't necessarily void.
Still stacking fallacies isn't usually a sign of a good and or valid argument.
Nice set of logical fallacies in this comment, and I don't see any citations supporting your anecdote.
I would tolerate them a little more if it weren't for the constant brigading.
Wanna analyze Marxist-Leninist-Maoist theory, self-crit, and all that good stuff? Fine by me, I like discussion of varying viewpoints. But often it's not about that but are bad faith arguments and whataboutisms about how the decadent West is ruled by the US and how Putin/Kim/Xi did nothing wrong.
It's exhausting. I don't go into their subs and rattle on about liberal market economics.
Like, I get it...I get their issues with capitalism. But it's not like socialism won't have it's own problems.
Personally, I'd rather not go through a bloody civil war in order to inact a new system, because I know that my children are going to be the ones that have to suffer that nightmare. I'd much rather try to fix the problems of our current system than start from the beginning with a brand new one.
"authoritarian communist" is an oxymoron to begin with. how can you build a society where everyone is equal by enforcing authority
Well, every so called communist government has been one, so there are examples...
Thanks for making my point.