It's understandable though. Just like they explain at the end of the article. Phones are established products with established paradigms at this point. We expect them to work just like they do work.
caused you to associate using Brave with supporting bigotry
Your comment, that I replied to, replied to this comment. Did you notice what it said? This is something I've heard and read on other occasions as well.
being homophobic
I wouldn't become homophobic, but by using Brave I would feel like I'd be condoning or supporting homophobia and bigotry. And I have no interest in feeling like that.
I never used Brave, and I never will because I don't want to be associated with or support bigotry. It might be the best browser in the world and I might be missing out, but homophobia isn't cool, so I'm fine with that.
This was suggested in another repost of this article. It does really have that vibe, yes. It's giving off this uncanny valley feeling of journalism. Lots of words, that... kinda say something?, but there's a lot of like, overlap? I'm having a hard time explaining it.
Yo I should give this show another go. I remember watching it when I wasn't even a teenager, thinking it was kind of silly. But maybe it's good as an adult?
That dude is no foss champion, at best just some user.
He doesn't have to be. And so is everybody else I'm watching on YouTube to get tips on FOSS and stuff. But nobody complains about them because they're not big enough.
If MS gives him money Windows & Edge will be the best
But "Linux" isn't giving him any money either, surely. This argument breaks down because of that.
He's doing these things now, and they are good now. Why complain? So cynical.
I disagree, but I don't know why. Intuitively it doesn't feel like this is a bad thing. The people that "get it" will be introduced to something that they like and will go down the good path. The people that don't get it, won't. Just like they weren't before. Net profit: we turned some people towards the light. 🤷♂️ I see it as a win.
We don't have to use the same method on all people either. This might work for some, but not all, surely.
I don't really understand the enshittification spreading part of your argument. Curious to know more about what you meant by that.
I saw Speed Racer after someone recommended it here on Lemmy. They said it was the best movie ever.
I thought it freaking sucked ass. Took me like five attempts to finish it. I got bored and watched something else 4 times before I could finish it.
It was so weird. The plot was just much too basic. Old story, told a thousand times, predictable and boring af. Special effects were (intentionally) poor and too zoomed in and shaky.
They made everything in focus, nothing was out of focus. I think this was a choice of the Wachowskis', but it made for some weird-looking things sometimes.
All the racing was too busy, with camera switches that were much too frequent. Gave me a headache. And I'm used to watching quick switching content. There was just too much color and nothing on focus and too quick. It was a bold choice but it backfired in my opinion.
It's understandable though. Just like they explain at the end of the article. Phones are established products with established paradigms at this point. We expect them to work just like they do work.
🤷♂️