Call me Lenny/Leni @ shinigamiookamiryuu @lemm.ee

It's nice to meet all you. I am she/her, can speak Toki Pona and English (n

---

Read more

Posts

138

Comments

5,088

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

That moment when you realize the thumbs downs are automated or done out of spite, based on the fact that a remark was withdrawn before getting the 5+ thumbs down. They have no credibility anymore, and rule enforcers should take note at who gives things thumbs ups and thumbs downs.

It would be good, then, that I don't fit most definitions of a troll, as far as I'm aware. What you are looking at is, as I can attest (as well as prove), a mixture of falsehoods, things taken out of context, things exaggerated to seem wrong, dead issues, and unconsented releases of personal information, all by one of any number of individuals who, if you look me up, has been happening everywhere, in obvious slander campaign fashion. They redirect to some of that, though they rejoice in the fact most people do not pick issues apart and give a true critique, instead looking at one person's warnings and garnering a general idea. This isn't some dismissal, it has been implied by those who realize their mistake.

People often ask me how or why I work for a media company that works in front of recording footage if I have stage fright. One does not necessitate having to expect the other, which is good because there's very little I can do work-wise.

It would be good, then, that I don't fit most definitions of a troll, as far as I'm aware. What you are looking at is, as I can attest (as well as prove), a mixture of falsehoods, things taken out of context, things exaggerated to seem wrong, dead issues, and unconsented releases of personal information, all by one of any number of individuals who, if you look me up, has been happening everywhere, in obvious slander campaign fashion. They redirect to some of that, though they rejoice in the fact most people do not pick issues apart and give a true critique, instead looking at one person's warnings and garnering a general idea. This isn't some dismissal, it has been implied by those who realize their mistake.

Searches manifest themselves differently for everyone. But in all of them, the majority is slander against me, virtually nothing but false complaints about me that are absolutist in their measures to paint me as some kind of negative individual. Even when I am condemnable, and I apologize, your approach and the approach of others is to speak for the person who forgave me and invalidate that, as I explained in an explanation of my perspective that is now getting flak because the next complaint is "it was asked by an anon, therefore it must be the person asking themself the question". Which isn't even abnormal, as some of the slander against me pulls people in based on association with me, sometimes claiming they are me so that additional claims can be added.

Funny thing about that, I'm not lying.

I am not sure what you are referring to as the logs don't show anything like that, but the closest thing to what you were describing was done because the comment advocated the acts of Luigi Mangione. As a rule enforcer, I'm around to enforce the rules, especially the TOS. In the case I described, I explained to multiple people that's why I removed it. And I'm she/her, not he/him (please don't do what transphobes do).

It is doxxing going by the definition laid out in the TOS. And it would be in most over places, because it's still locally undisclosed personal information. As has been discovered by a rogue admin, some of what you say I have disclosed in fact hasn't been disclosed, some not anywhere. When you look up my name, for example, what do you find? Just the slander your likes have been spreading everywhere.

You aren’t actually concerned about doxxing, you want this post to get deleted

Spoken like someone who came storming in not caring about the TOS. I strive to go by the TOS wherever I go, which might be why, aside from DA, the only places I've been given the boot from (out of the thousands of places I'm in) are those where it's stated that who is banned is up to unspoken rules and opinions admins might have. And even these I respect, and I don't go anywhere that isn't my business.

When it comes to how to react, admins know better. Critical thinkers know better. Your puppets, be them hands-on or inspired, don't. There lies the difference. I know my people. It doesn't help peoples' cases when they admit to not looking into it all before reacting. Your closing argument, as well as having a deceptive premise, just screams "I don't care that the people in charge made this place with their own hands, I'm going to defy them", which you did by using a serious center as a means to incite a reaction. So you're one to talk (especially about boundaries).

The fact this reply is getting thumbs downs just proves that those doing so are, in one way or another, puppets of the OP.

Funny thing about that, I have. But one side doesn't give up.

Could something be done about it then? It's using a serious place as a way to incite a reaction with a combination of slander and doxxing. The same kind of thing happened elsewhere, and the people in charge there, from looking into it, can attest the campaign against me is little more than a means to pit people against an undesired person.

You aren't unjustified in this. Politics has become a complex web, and it's difficult to grasp a singular feeling for the nation they pertain to, such as pride, especially when you politicize something like the flag. Even if your stance is on the other side of the spectrum, this is on America.

Proven wrong how?

Read up and find out, as I'd tell anyone.

Does the chat/Discord screenshot have a link to it? Exactly.

All of this is addressed in the place I redirected to except for the final thing you mentioned. I shouldn't even have to address that part.

a lot of people are going to assume that you’re dishonest.

Well thanks for confirming slander is your intent.

First of all, ad hominem. Second, it is nothing more than falsely-concluded speculation to say I asked myself. Third, I don't even sound how you claim/imply I do. Fourth, again, in bulk it has been addressed.

So as a word to all those who are onlookers here and are wondering what's going on, this is the second person so far who has tried to participate in the same mass slander of me, as has been happening around the web. I figured this might happen, which is why I can redirect to my complete perspective, which proves the original asker/poster wrong. Ironically, the one thing they're consistently right about are their words "don't believe everything you hear", which also applies to things that seem convincing enough not to consult both sides.

See what I mean now? Proving them wrong (or not doing so) doesn’t just make this go away. These are a special kind of people.

Do you see what I mean now?

Prove them wrong in one place and they start up in another.

That and more is answered elsewhere.

The issue is a well-known issue but also a dead one.

Younger than probably was wise of me. I got into sarpa salpa when I was entering my teen years. It's a fish species with symptoms that are like LSD when ingested (so not a plant; I don't do any plant ones). The best way to describe it is that the vibes and the physical characteristics of what you're thinking of switch places.