roguetrick @ roguetrick @kbin.social

Posts

4

Comments

1,213

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think you may have, since as you can see by the quotes my comment has about zero relevance to Hillary and is in response to a hypothetical and not my feelings on the case as a whole.

Penalty for breaching that oath is impeachment. That's not a codified measure, and why a whole lot of the arguments are based on administrative law, norms, and exactly how the president makes new administrative law. If it was codified, it'd be a different story.

I was talking about this guy's actual legal arguments about hypothetical administrative powers of the presidency. I do not give a shit about Hillary's emails and I did feel that what trump did was illegal.

I see that you still have no idea what the hell I was talking about, but you still consider yourself superior.

in that hypothetical

As in, the poster making an argument that he had the right to handle documents however he wanted

I don't believe he had that right

As in, I don't think he was able to do that.

Are you people fucking this dense? I am not a trump supporter.

Why the fuck do you think I give a shit about Hilary's emails? You seem to have confused me, an anti-fascist socialist, for a Trump supporter.

Your brain is iliterally mush.

Yeah, great reading comprehension on your part friend. Now feel free to explain to me the interplay between the oath of office, administrative law, and the lack of codified law on the subject.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PineTreeFlag

I'd never heard of it.

Very funny for the religious right to be appropriating Locke quotes and Iroquois symbolism.

The Locke quotes reminds me of the Chinese concept of the "mandate of heaven", but more populist

clear duty to protect their secrecy

Ethical duty, not legal duty in that hypothetical. I don't believe he had that right, though.

If you post bad memes in a shitposting community, aren't you just really good at shitposting?

Seems silly to characterize one of the key functions of the court (deciding what case to take) as rigging. I'm not saying that I don't find this court a reactionary shit pile, just that they're acting exactly as you'd expect them to

I let lurkers do the upvoting or downvoting unless it's really good or really bad Downvotes don't federate from or to kbin anyway.

Her mother drank when she was pregnant.

A real leader gets caught and finds someone to throw under the bus.

What disqualifies him for being a viable sheriff isn't that he's a ratfucker. It's because he couldn't get any of his fellow ratfuck deputies to do his dirty work for him.

yeah I realized later that I was thinking of the other one

They want a fascist. The rhetoric from the speaker race proves that. They just seem to secretly want their fascist to be an easily manipulated idiot despite the fact that tends to get you randomly put against the wall.

Too dumb and weak to be Mussolini, but wants to for sure.

pull requests can be merged by any repo member

They'd be crazy to do so.