roguetrick @ roguetrick @kbin.social

Posts

4

Comments

1,213

Joined

2 yr. ago

That I'll concede. Can you guess what I meant though.

What I'm saying is actually a bit more involved than that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structuralfunctionalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialconflicttheory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticaltheory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theoryofvalue(economics)

Prices would raise, because they always raise to however much people are willing to pay for it. As long as people are tipping, they're voluntarily adding that instead of waiting for the market to correct for it. That said, you are also correct that prices are NOT the only place that businesses will go to protect their margin. If margins get too low to run a business due to labor, rents will have to decrease to keep businesses in the buildings. Similarly, if margins increase too much, landlords will increase the rent.

You mostly seem to like to post smug personal attacks in my interactions with you, but hey, you can operate under whatever delusions you want. It doesn't bother me.

Yeah man, but I'd totally stick with Shampoo while mastering the Anything Goes school.

I think you just have a structural/functional view of the world that is fundamentally incompatible with how I view it.

It really is a recursive situation of uselessness. She goes onto news media to promote her own ability to make execs feel like she can help them promote their own ability. All we achieve is making corporate leaders feel entitled to their position and more money extracted from people actually creating value.

A job who's qualifications comes from news media exposure and being

one of only 20 Master Brand Strategists

Is an absolute corporate grift.

Uh huh, well feel free to contact me if you ever arrive at a point.

I like to give people the benefit of the doubt

You mostly seem to like to post smug personal attacks in my interactions with you, but hey, you can operate under whatever delusions you want. It doesn't bother me.

Hello pot, I'm the kettle.

Wow, this "etiquette expert" grift is more interesting than the article itself. https://www.valerieandcompany.com/

Internationally recognized as a National News Contributor, Valerie is an expert in her field of leadership presence and personal branding. She is one of only 20 Master Brand Strategists worldwide and has received front-page press coverage in the Wall Street Journal as a pioneer in executive coaching.

Take a hot shower and avoid cold water I figure.

In the states, it's actually usually integrated except for nursing homes(continuing care in this model) and to a lesser extent behavioral and addiction (though that's often integrated with acute care). In many places a single metro organization (like hopkins, frederick health, and meritus in maryland) will have all the other legs.

Being spread out just makes it harder to administer when private because you don't have the whole pipeline to control.

Seems dumb. Care is provided through collaboration of those entities and is generally local. This sounds like it will function fine for the areas of the province without access issues, but throw those with access issues under the bus.

I think it's about breaching administrative policies and procedures in the handling of classified materials with penalties based on the codified law delegating those procedures to the executive. What I don't believe it its based on concepts of legal duty derived from things like the oath of office.

You actually don't understand my argument. What you're talking about now is WHY I think trump broke the law. It has nothing to do with oaths of office. Oaths of office do NOT create a legal duty. That code, as well as the administrative law around

without authority

from that code is what creates a legal duty.

That's the definition of a derived duty, and it isn't what I'd call "law."

I'm not getting into semantics, I'm talking about the original post I replied to, namely

he has a clear duty to protect their secrecy

Which is talking about a duty in derived sense, not a codified duty.

No, I'm talking about law. Administrative law is set by the administrative branch of the government as delegated by congress. It's not codified, but is the policy and procedures of those administrative bodies, which has the force of law. Breaching those policies and procedures, which is what Trump did, is in violation of administrative law.

A legal duty is a more nebulous concept that is generally based on legal precedent. Usually has to do with something related to torts. You can't just take someone to court for an novel legal duty and expect that to magically stick criminally. It needs to be codified by congress or created in administrative law first.