Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NA
Posts
0
Comments
315
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You can click into the cross-post and see that this was originally posted yesterday on World News. You can also see this is cross posted in r/conservative.

    This also isn't the first piece by NYT on this topic. Just within the last month they have published 5 articles on this same crime.

    Does that mean this single reported event needs to be reposted to the news subs 10+ times? Seems like a way to drown out the numerous genocidal acts happening daily.

    What is the point of having separate news and world news communities if one is just going to be a repost location for another?

    You can also look at the article itself and see it is clearly a propoganda attempt to justify genocide.

    They aren't writing articles for each child bombed or starved to death, which is still ongoing, to redirect focus to a single criminal act.

    It should also be pointed out, this criminal act can't be handled by a criminal justice system because of the genocide being enacted on Palestine by Israel. A rape is something that calls for a judicial process, not a military response.

  • Why is this article on a single rape being reposted daily?

    I'll say what I said in the last post, I am unable to muster the energy to care about a single rape in the face of mass slaughter/genocide.

    It's only natural for victims of long-term mass violence to resist with violence. The question is why is this single act of violence worth an article, but we are not seeing individual articles for each child starved to death by Israel?

    My answer is this rape is being leveraged as propoganda to justify the Holocaust 2.0.

    Hitler would rage about the crimes of the jews as justification for the first run, it only makes sense for the new nazis to repeat the strategy.

  • If you truly believed this, you would be offended by the political use of rape to justify the genocide of children.

    You don't want to engage what my comment actually said, the fact that a single rape in the face of genocide does not an article make.

    My comment was about the focus on this crime as an individual act justifying genocide and you want to refocus back to the singular act while not really addressing the editorializing of NYT.

    You are playing the game the genocidal people want you to play instead of engaging this propoganda meaningfully.

  • civilian collateral damage

    Nazis can fuck off.

    This is exactly what I'm calling out, using individual crimes to justify genocide.

    You won't even accurately address the crimes because they are so heinous.

    We are talking about genocide. Starving children is in no way a military operation so you can suck that lie back up your ass.

  • Now, write an individual article for each child starved to death or bombed by Israel. I can't muster the energy to care about a single rape in the middle of a genocide.

    We have rape kits in Texas that have gone untested for over a decade. If rape was important to the people enacting justice, we have a long list to get through before we can start worrying about rapes in warzones.

    But justice isn't the intent behind articles like this. They want to justify the genocide with individual crimes.

  • The only downside to blocking you is you might keep thinking I agree with you

    You don't read so good

    Propagandists can fuck off or address reality if they want to be included in the conversation.

    Nobody except you is confused about what the other person is saying.

  • This nonsense is more bullshit propagated by the fake news about Biden having anything to do with the retreat signed and ordered by Donald Trump.

    Propagandists can fuck off or address reality if they want to be included in the conversation.

  • We clearly don't know this if the headline is written as it was. Also there is clearly people here sharing these kinds of bullshit headlines so this point needs to continue being hammered in the face of this propoganda.

  • Portcrystals are not the same thing as ferrystones and are useless without them.

    You are speaking from ignorance.

    They give you some ferrystones in the game as well, but it is artificially limited to force microtransactions into a single-player game. It literally goes against the design of the game.

  • We can start another billboard race on top of already oversized vehicles.

    A lot of people carry a button that makes their car beep. That's the fix. Or maybe people who can't find a vehicle in a parking lot shouldn't be driving multiple tons of metal around?

  • Despite this, shame is still a valid application of positive punishment to active participants of an abusive subgroup.

    Go be the carrot to somebody who needs a philosophy 101 course to justify defending actively harmful forms of propoganda from criticism. I'm not your guy, I have my own objectives in this discourse.

    Ultimately, none of this invalidates the observation of an ironic use of a victim complex.