nac82 @ nac82 @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

315

Joined

2 yr. ago

I didn't say anything about immunity to propaganda.

Feel free to address what I said, though. I'm mocking the ironic victim complex of abusive individuals.

This statement is an immediate bannable offense in many places, but the 2nd amendment allows for firearm ownership. Many states have stand your ground or home defense laws supporting lethal home defense. In America, our founding is justified by the need for violent resistance against tyrannical governments.

I know these aren't directly contradictory things, but it feels like doublespeak, the way the topics are viewed.

its the world's fault for me being a complete piece of shit

Lmao, the victim complex of the most abusive subgroup of men on the planet is hilarious.

Defending violence from the bland corporate talking points of non-violent resistance.

People will say the dumbest "violence is never the answer" and then get upset when you point out they clearly don't believe that.

Texas and Florida have been using state emergency funds to pay private companies 10000x markup to ship illegal immigrants around the nation for over a year and have not been charged for it. They are lying about jobs to trick migrants into this plot. This falls under the terms for human trafficking.

So no, it's perfectly legal for a state to move migrants around. Especially if you are not coercing them.

Lmao, can't even stop changing the comments after saying bye.

Sorry you expect people to read your mind instead of your words.

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?

Your comment is junk.

So basic critical thinking makes clear the scope of my discussion. Sorry this confused you.

Don't be a hostile prick if you don't want a hostile chat. Of course, you cry victim after being disrespectful to everything said to you.

The word never is not for singular occurrences lmao.

But whatever 5 page bullshit narrative you need to weave to feel better, have at it.

in general, sure, violence is right for self defense

So everything I've said is true, and you admit you were full of it in your initial comment.

I never said anything about the girl in the story. You're making shit up to disagree with because what you said was wrong.

Thanks.

That wasn't what I said at all. Feel free to address what I said.

Edit: the comment I responded to has been changed. I originally responded to a comment that said. "violence is never right". I would like to point out it was changed because what I said was a spot on callout, but the dude can't admit it and wants to change the comments to misrepresent what we said. They have since edited nearly every comment in this chain. Dude was acting like a prick and wanted to scrub all that so he could call me hostile for reacting to his cheap insults.

Violence is right in many instances, including self-defense from bigots.

I guarantee if somebody broke into your home and started stabbing your loved ones, you would suddenly find a moral stance on violent self-defense.

In reality, outside of lofty platitudes fed to you by corporations to keep you passive, the only good things on this planet were earned through violence and protected from ruin by violence. To claim otherwise is ignorance.

That doesn't sound right to me. My first playthrough was blind. Me and a buddy ran straight to Nightsong in chapter 2 and got a flag that warned us to check the rest. We managed to save the prisoners and then go do the nightsong.

blocks you out of content for no reason

Example? Most of the sequential questing is necessary for the complex narrative of a tabletop campaign.

Good job taking the high road, I appreciate you taking the time to write out a serious response to him. I'm sick and tired of meeting violent, bigoted rhetoric with fair responses they will refuse to engage.

I've degraded to letting them hear the violence redirected back to them. It feels like they at least hear what I'm saying this way.

How dare I make you confront the reality of your claims. You can't blame comprehension when it's a direct quote of your comment.

I love that you announced this like I would be sad I made some bigot run away like a coward.

What topic of their post was your question about?

What a world we live in where children are dying because people can’t manage to learn some pronouns.

It's literally the topic you are responding to bright guy. Your response was

I think it has more to do with trying to dictate the language people use.

Meaning you think if I have my language that I use to demean you censored, it's reasonable to react with violence.

It's literally your point

Ask questions if you're confused. Follow your own advice before giving it out.

So you're saying if I get banned for telling you "shut up pussy" I should just beat you to death?

Is that seriously the point you want to make?

Edit: lmao, he's now crying because I quoted his comments back to him in context and blocked me over it.

China is the goal for US progression?