nac82 @ nac82 @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

315

Joined

2 yr. ago

He said to cope with facts he had no retorts for.

You are functionally the same. If it quacks like a duck and shits all over the place like a duck...

Yall even count as good as each other. "Embarrassed Republican" is 2 words.

Because you are a single issue voter with an excuse why fighting fascism isn't a responsibility of yours.

The status quo serves you fine and you don't care about the suffering enacted on others. The BS candidate you are endorsing has 0 experience in government and is starting at the presidency? Yup.

The hallmarks of an embarrassed Republican.

Not what was said. Sorry you're struggling to read.

Says the embarrassed Republican lmao.

Lmao, the projection. How can ypu see to type through those tears?

Single policy voter? Might as well admit you were an embarrassed Republican to begin with.

Why?

Who are you voting for?

You say ypu don't have all the details to rid yourself of being responsible for the hate you are defending, because you're an idiot.

Good for you.

Go defend radical hate to somebody who cares what uninformed idiots have to say.

If you don't have all the facts, then it's best to shut up and move forward.

Learn to take your own advice before telling others to do it.

I'm stating the difference between an invader and a civilian distinctly.

Your inability to address what I've said isn't my problem.

I dont think I have to answer that to say it is wrong to starve children to death.

Yea, if an invading force is slaughtering people to conquer your home, they are no longer just civilians. They are active combatants.

How many Israeli children starved to death yesterday?

Nazis had children too and didn't justify the actions of the Nazis.

You don't counter coping techniques. It's not a logical stance and will not be countered by logic.

Gish gallop.

You made an absolute out of genocide and then kited right past the fact your original stance was an absolute acceptance of genocide despite the obvious other answers.

You will not stop clawing to justify the genocide, I don't care to continue debating genocidal nazis.

We call this, projection.

You can't come to terms with the hate and slaughter you support, so you project your guilt to others.

The implication of your proposition is that only genocide can decide this.

Your assumption is ludicrous and fascist. It says everything that needs to be said about your beliefs. By assuming only bloodshed is the solution, you remove the responsibility for you to face the genocide you are supporting.

I would have a criminal investigation and follow-up to this genocide similar to the Nuremberg Trials.

I want the people responsible locked up for life, and I want freedom for the people of Palestine.

So how about you? Can you honestly answer what exactly you want out of this?