You're not interested in the topic, you mean. You just want somebody to pitch a softball so you can swing, but were scared of the speed on that fast ball.
What the fuck is a guy who has never held public office, who is filling his leadership team with more people who have never held public office, going to do when they are stuck with their hands tied with no allies in the presidency?
Nice moving goalposts dipshit. We went from "the cops let them in" to "they only beat the cops to the edge of death and then they died of heart attacks."
Lmao, you literally can't even understand what you quoted. Are you a native English speaker? Did you miss everything about the defibrillator? Don't understand how a cardiac arrest can be triggered by excessive physical trauma?
Still focusing on your shifted goalposts too.
Refusing to defend your disproven point because you know it's not a tenable position.
So you just run like the coward you are.
Can't even address how beating cops is not a sign of cops helping you get through the doors.
Yes. Medical science can bring people back from having their heart stopped.
But if you could actually read for shit you would notice I said they were beaten to the edge of death then died of heart attacks.
Good job pointdexter.
Maybe this is the first time you've heard of a defibrillator?
But it's funny that's the point you want to debate, why are you refusing to talk about your shift from "the cops let them in willingly" to "they only beat the cops to death"?
The individuals who passed physical fitness exams annually just so happened to have major cardiac attacks after being BEATEN TO DEATH.
If it wasn't them being violently beaten to death, ypu wouldn't have known the exact individuals being identified.
And I'm pretty sure you don't have to be beaten to death to prove you were beaten in a way that proves you didn't cooperate willingly.
Nice moving goalposts dipshit. We went from "the cops let them in" to "they only beat the cops to the edge of death and then they died of heart attacks."
I see a lot of MMOs being recommended, but I find them to be either shallow in combat or predatory unless you are seeking MMO specific things, so I'm going to point at single player/coop stuff.
Bethesda has a large selection of open world games, but I pretty much assume people have played all of them (Elder Scrolls / Fallout games).
If you are okay with going outside of Fantasy, the Far Cry series has some impressive technology in their older titles. Far Cry 2 is a personal favorite, your PC might be able to handle it.
Borderlands series.
The original Dragons Dogma: Dark Arisen holds up. This is probably my best recommendation based on your asks.
Lego Star Wars or the Lego Marvel game.
Fable 1, 2, 3
The Middle Earth Shadow of Mordor / Shadow of War Games were pretty incredible but might be too high-end.
The first Red Dead Redemption might run for you.
Early Dark souls games might run. Maybe 1 or 2.
From here, I would start listing old Star Wars Jedi Knight series games.
I could probably go on, but this is most of the good stuff off the top of my head.
I forgot to add Mass Effect. Great for sci-fi, great leveling, and combat.
Yes, you are coping. That's why I said it. Glad you recognize it as true.
You are going to a 2 party election and not participating, which means you have a tacit agreement with the status quo.
If you had a legitimate candidate, they would have primaried for one of the 2 parties that will actually matter in the election. If they can't win a primary against the major candidates, guess what sherlock, they ain't winning the election.
If you aren't aware of the 2 party system in the United States, then I agree it is probably your first election.
And? You think this site needs to be enshittified because a good feature was used by reddit first?
Petty comment imo.