hh93 @ hh93 @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

337

Joined

2 yr. ago

The only thing annoying with BG3 is that "sell all wares" only refers to those at the current character

I'd have liked it if stuff marked as wares would always be automatically distributed between the characters (or that there was a button to do this)

Also why can I select multiple items at once and move them between characters but not mark multiple items as wares?

Why can't I save that every cup I pick up should go to wares automatically?

I feel as if BG3 could've made the whole carrying thing far less annoying with ways to do less inventory management

Of course they know that what they do is wrong

But thoughts aren't criminal and if they manage to control their attraction in a way that hurts no-one (like this ai-generated stuff or the child-sex-dolls or other things that are very creepy to almost everyone else) then they should totally be normal members of society

I'm not saying that they should be proud of it and see it as something normal - it's definitely a psychological issue - but denying them stuff that helps them satisfy their urges without hurting anyone should be a good step to help them face their sexuality instead of suppressing them

I think it should totally be possible to access things like it but it should also be necessary to link to a helpline like the one you mentioned (Germany has something like that) similar to how a helpline for suicide is necessary if someone mentions that subject

No one chooses to be a pedophile - as far as we know it's just the unluckiest possible sexual attraction.

Stigmatizing it won't help anyone - those people need help and everything that doesn't hurt real children until they get themselves that psychological help is good in my book

One of the biggest German meat production companies started introducing vegetarian and vegan products 10 years ago - last year they made more profit from then than from their meat branch and are remodelling meat-processing factories for replacements - it's just like everywhere - if you don't lead or follow the change you'll have to try to stop change itself

The shitty thing is that this culture war against replacements is also majorly fucking up our chances to combat climate change as a change away from the meat-heavy diet most people have on a population level would be one of the most effective changes we could make as a society to give us a better chance...

Also to add to that: a lot of the European carmakers also fought governments hard to give them more time with their fossil fuel cars and not to push/benefit EV as much as they wanted

Then Tesla came along and suddenly they had a lot of catch-up to do when they realised that people actually wanted those cars and now they are the ones behind the market since they slept to long

In Germany there's a saying: "Wer nicht mit der Zeit geht der geht mit der Zeit" - basically: "If you're not moving with the changes they will force you out eventually"

It's kind of the same in Rio

Many favelas moved to the hills near cities where it was too expensive to build with 0 supporting infrastructure

Bow that the city grew suddenly you have luxury houses right next to a favela and the favela has the best view of the city

Both parties create an ordered list of candidates and then they get seats from the top as many as they need based on their statewide votes.

Yeah this won't stop a single accident - and it will probably not result in more money for the kids, too since many people won't be able to pay from prison

For #2 to add: you can just install them over a parking lot, too

Makes people happy that their car isn't exposed to the sun/rain anymore and not removing anything from NIMBYs that fear for their car-privileges

Not to mention that building new plants can take a decade and costs a fortune - if you invest that money into renewables and power storages you have working power much faster.

Also OPs graphic is a real problem but it only goes until last year where we just got rid of Merkel. Her party was actively working on making it as hard as possible to work wind turbines while investing into gas from russia so with the new government the speed should finally pick up again

Of course shutting down existing nuclear reactors is a bad idea (which also happened because of Merkel) but that decision was made so long ago that the companies running those plants prepared for them to shut down for a decade and have stopped hiring people, the ones working there are on retirement contracts and they didn't invest into future proofing the plants anymore so they were kind of falling apart

They don't have more power - the government was just stupid to give them contracts this longlasting

Also every other phone is priced at the point of you buying a new device in 3 years anyway because the battery is glued in while the FP should have a far longer lifecycle

The same rules are in place for the kippah or wearing crosses afaik - so your point is invalid

Even if 1 billionaire is polluting as much as 1000 average people - cutting the consumption of everyone in half is doing far more towards a better climate than reducing the pollution of those to 0.

Sure it's a thing that needs to happen to get everyone on board - but stop pointing with fingers since without personal change the politicians won't change a thing as cutting meat by law will make them lose their office immediately unless a decent chunk of the population already went that route voluntarily

In that case they deleted a link to illegal content in their jurisdiction - so should be fine - shouldn't it?

So if you have a collection with political targets and the folder is just google maps links to their houses with their names as the bookmark name google shouldn't be allowed to stop you from spreading this?

Sure google is shitty but this feature is designed to share links with other people and sometimes those links can be dangerous so imho it's absolutely necessary to moderate them at some level.

NIMBYs on another level

Capitalism only working well for the top dogs while the rest has to fight for the crumbs? Unheard of...

They don't can women from wearing them - just children that usually wear whatever their parents want them to wear without having a choice.

It's about making a conscious decision while also removing as much religion from schools as possible

It's also showing those children that it's not bad if you're not wearing that kind of clothing.

If they want to use them as a cultural choice when they are adults that's fine - the problem is if they never new anything else as the default.

Putting a bird that knew freedom back in a cage is harder than keeping one caged all their life. It just makes it easier for those children to break out of their patriarchal structures