Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HF
Posts
0
Comments
120
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Right, and Irish-Americans have more knowledge and understanding about Irish-American culture.

    The other poster was making it seem like American culture is homogenous or like descendants of immigrants can't still retain distinct cultural traditions and identities outside of generic American. Whether or not those traditions are the same as the original country of origin is immaterial. Nobody is claiming that it is.

  • What I don't understand is why Americans portray themselves as Dutch when coming to the Netherlands.

    Do they, though? Are there really that many Americans who think or try to pretend they are actually Dutch, instead of Americans who are have Dutch ancestry?

    It honestly sounds like they are just trying to connect by sharing a commonality and something that is (probably) important to them in some way. It's an expression of appreciation. Even if the cultural traditions carried on in the US are different than in the modern-day country--so what? It doesnt make those cultural traditions less important to the people who celebrate them. I fail to understand what is wrong with acknowledging or appreciating where those traditions originated.

    Is it just a matter of semantics and an objection to the label itself "(whatever nationality)-American"?

  • The level of authority that you're speaking with about another country's culture while clearly only having a surface-level understanding is actually wild. Maybe accept that the Americans who are telling you otherwise have more knowledge and understanding of their own culture.

  • Very different these days. The beauty of the status bubbles and messengers of past is that you would catch each other when you both had time and desire to chat and then you'd have a back and forth conversation until one of you disengaged. You also almost never have people sending offline messages. It was more akin to an in-person interaction where you're either visibly there and someone can approach and talk to you in real time or you aren't.

    Texting is generally of a blend between real-time messenging (but you can't tell if they're available) and short form email where everyone interacts differently and has their own ideas about "proper" etiquette. It's probably somewhat cultural but in my experience, people just use messaging apps in the exact same way as they would text, so status bubbles don't mean much.

  • I do this to my mom as a way to be very low-contact with her. It's a huge relief.

    I used to love texting when it was only a handful of friends but these days I hate the pressure of it being ever-present in my pocket and the social expectation to answer in a relatively timely manner. (This has led me to being a horrible texter, sorry everyone.)

    I miss the old days of AOL instant messenger. Your online status did all the heavy lifting to communicate when you had some free time and felt like chatting.

  • It's definitely just me, but I think every event like this is just for consumers that don't know any better.

    You're against performing arts/live shows and think people who enjoy them are suckers? That truly is a wild take.