guylacaptivite @ guylacaptivite @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

150

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ok thanks finally some insight on your thoughts. See how it gives better context than just saying "What is this" and gesticulating towards the internet. Your question was heavily influenced by prejudice.

Most of the talk does not refer to fantasy, that is a great example of some "unempirical evidence". Some do, a lot don't, you need to be able to filter that. Sure If you look for it, the worst will appear. But stop mindlessly reading what pops in front of you and make some active research and your worldview might change.

The rest is just you thinking out loud. Nobody takes everything so seriously all the time about every subject. Honestly I'm thinking you are falling for what you seem so concerned about. Look away from the endless stream sometimes. Search for your own source of news. Make your own change. The world certainly looks grim if we let rampant capitalism unleashed, but you are not proposing anything here. This here post is you disguising a rant into a question.

Sorry my man but you are not clear at all. I'm trying to understand what you do not understand about people talking with each other. There's nothing more to it. It's neither good nor bad nor strong or weak, it's just a discussion. What happens afterwards with the information each gathered from the discussion is different but we need context. It's what the discussion is ABOUT that is important not the discussion in itself.

So give us some context. Are you talking about journalism in media or are you also questioning whether we should discuss our hobbies with like minded individuals? Are you implying there's something wrong with social media because it allow anyone to talk with anybody about anything?

WIthout answers to these your questions is pointless I'm afraid.

edit: Otherwise, if I try to answer your question as it was written: Yes it's good, Yes it's bad. More details are needed to judge beyond that.

A conversation, simply. There's no requirements for having a discussion. That's what we do, we speak to each other whether for good or bad.

And just in case because I'm still not completely sure if you are actually asking something or just making a social comment on online media; The literal antonym to what you seem to describe would be a "subjective" or "speculative" discussion. There's other antonyms but I'll let you search those out to see which fits your need.

What is your question though? Yes online forums exist, yes the information is often unempirical. But what is your question here? What is the "this" you are questionning yourself about? Are you asking why people debate each other? Why people are curious about subjects even though they are wrong? I just don't get what you are trying to say here.

If anything, this whole weekend just confirmed I will never go to Vegas ever. This city is really a boomers definition of a good time. It's all ersatz luxury. The golden sharpie of cities.

Then why do the most of us let something like this happen. And while some countries have better healthcare there is still an enormous amount of suffering everywhere be it starvation, war, homelessness you name it. We have the means to be better but we don't do it.

Incomprehensibly depressing. Everything about this should make us ashamed of ourselves as a species. Or we should just stop pretending that we value each other more than cash. Or at all actually.

You still wrote what you wrote. You should block that from your mind that would be actually helpful. And don't brush off being confronted as me being obsessed with outrage. Stop saying stupid harmful stuff and actually think about it beforehand.

My reason is the harmful and completely unfounded bullshit you are engaging in. I will always confront this kind of speech.

Gotta be a joke right

Looked into it a bit and you are right, it wasn't intended. The articles I've read all mention camming out as an unexpected bonus.

Why did you reply to a post strongly implying that women have responsibility in men not showing emotions with your personal experience then? I know you are neither op nor oc. I'm speaking about your comment.

I'm pointing out that these guys are using the bullshit excuse that men don't show emotions because of women. That is an incel argument that generalizes and vilifies all women as the enemy of manhood. Incredibly stupid and potentially harmful.

That doesn't mean it's because they were women. You said it yourself, you got in relationships with the wrong people and that's the only valid conclusion to make. Don't use anecdotal evidence like your personal experience to spew some bullshit about women somehow bullying men who show emotions.

That's bullshit incel rhetoric.

Phillips is just common in consumer goods as it's designed to cam out when over torqued by the average joe. Better to have it stripped but tight than a broken head.

Still sucks balls when you know what you are doing though.

Probably because they wanted to show the variance over time which one pie chart cannot visually show. And it's easier to compare a circle vs a circle than a pie chart.

Eating is a fundamental physiological need. Making money from selling food isn't. We have the means to feed everyone but it's nor profitable. The ecomomy is a human fabrication.

They would because they get paid for it. These people aren't journalists, their job is just to write the favorable articles for the people who paid their boss for it. Whoever gives 10/10 to anything should not be taken seriously.

Not all of Starfield is randomly generated. This specific example is from one of the main big cities that are definitely hand built. The random stuff is mostly deserts and outposts like what players can build. So even according to your standards, this is a correct and legitimate comparison.