Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)BI
Posts
0
Comments
464
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Collages when used in a transformative way are not a copyright violation. It's mostly a case by case thing because people will make a "collage" that is just an image with some sparkles around it.

    The example you're responding to where you make a picture of your face would almost certainly not be considered a copyright violation.

  • Not even slightly.

    The Jews control the world conspiracy is rooted in the idea that there is a secret cabal of powerful people who manipulate the world systems behind the scenes.

    My post contained literally no logic of the sort and even talked about how authors are regularly shot down and copyright just isn't as powerful as they think it is.

    It's not about a secret group of wealthy people controlling the state.

    It's not about people controlling things through subversion.

    It's literally just about the status quo of copyright law and the fact that authors regularly try to extend it to hilarious and harmful overextension and fail.

    The only connection between my post and Jewish conspiracy is "small group trying to make money".

  • You should have to actually pay for works that cost money, but authors don't have the right to nitpick and five tune the ways that their stuff is used so long as the uses aren't copying and redistributing their work.

    Authors have tried to use excessive control of copyright many times and get shot down every single time with things like web scraping and search engines. Demanding payment for AI training specifically is a massive grift and overreach from a small group of people trying to hold back progress so they can make a quick buck.

  • I don’t want to pay YT because

    I started paying them and they jacked up the prices the next month leaving like 12 dollars stranded in my account because I use a gift card. Fuck their premium subscription.

  • OP has pointed out that he doesn't actually think there are exact replicas being produced, which just makes this even more confusing.

    Your misread their first comment, I think.

    They were saying that DESPITE the common arguments that AI only learns and doesn't copy exactly it might still be good to require consent for people's content to be in training data.

  • AI chat bots are something else. I don't understand the people using them as girlfriends, but it's like a whole new genre of porn.

    And you don't have to pay. You can host it yourself. Look up a program called "silly tavern"

  • I think the idea is that if the model doesn't know what Jennifer Lopez is, it couldn't make imitations of her naked.

    Realistically that ship has sailed and AI is capable enough now that even if the data wasn't there it could be pretty easily added.

    It will need to become a simple fact of life. If we can imagine something now, we can have pictures of it. There is no putting this back in the bottle.