aidan @ aidan @lemmy.world

Posts

21

Comments

1,970

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Its not allowing the release, its requiring it.

High income in New York is definitely above 1% globally, and likely even nearing 1% nationally

Well the rich it seems did vote for Mamdani

You lost. That flag don't fly.

This is a really bad argument that people use. Plenty good causes have lost.

The issue with the Confederacy is that it was a really bad cause, fighting for the enslavement of millions for generations.

Have you been to America? Plenty of leftists around the country fly American flags.

This is pointless

I've never used any, but Molly seems well liked

You can use Signal with a different client. Signal being operated within the US has no effect. As of now the jurisdictions that I know of to be worried about are:

The UK, where Apple was recently ordered to remove end-to-end encryption features, and have been gagged from talking about it

Sweden, where a law is proposed to add an encryption backdoor

The EU, where leadership is pushing for an encryption backdoor

My understanding is that the Indian government under the BJP and Congress has been pretty consistently anti-encryption, and violated privacy rights

France arrested the founder of Telegram for using end to end encryption in Telegram

Australia in 2018 passed a law that enabled the government to require communications platforms add a backdoor for government decryption. The Director of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) said that “privacy is important but not absolute”. Which has the same vibes as "this is not about human rights, this is about human life."

WhatsApp was previously suspended in Brazil for refusing to hand over decrypted messages.

Austria is in the process of passing legislation allowing police to backdoor encryption in messaging apps

China and Russia are very obvious problems. Here's an easy one of many examples

The White House both in Trump's first term and in Biden's presidency were pro-encryption. Signal and Tor were US government funded projects. That's not to say the US is great on encryption, and there have been laws in the past that did/were proposed to limit it. But, as of now, it seems that the US is (edit: one of) the most hospitable jurisdictions for encrypted messaging non-profits.

BTW, I'm not saying using Tox is bad, or that Signal is good, I'm just talking about the US jurisdiction part.

Does it really matter who made it if you can see the source code? You don't have to trust them.

I don't think so, rubber bullets travel relatively slow, I don't think they would be accurate enough to aim for the eyes. I do think they're probably not careful enough about the face of though

I agree, I don't think that a lack of current understanding proves the existence of god in any way. But them drawing the wrong conclusion doesn't mean that they aren't right about there being a lack of current understanding.

It's not 2014 anymore

Yeah, I'm not trying to say its black and white, I'm just saying its not as devoid of nuance as I feel like they're presenting it.

Constant purity testing, and invalidating everything someone says because you disagree on a couple issues 💀

And engineers who stood to make a lot of money

I think thats a kinda dumb purity test when they clearly did put a lot of effort into actually trying, and I don't see why its better if they threw away the supply they already mistakenly bought.

lol ok

Well aren't many religions inherently by their beliefs one of those things?

Yeah, but it seems like for a lot of people they either have to believe all of it or none of it

Yeah that's a fair perspective I have. I just don't like when people aren't honest about their problem with it because they want to act like they're okay with religion.