You understand that while this would give better results, this is an example of the problem under discussion - you're deferring to businesses listed on Google, washed with Google reviews and promotion. Businesses that don't actively try/pay to work with Google functionally don't exist - they are the gatekeeper, toll collector, marketplace, and the arbiter of good and bad. They don't do this altruistically or honestly - they do it for profit, and the crashing quality of their search results is evidence of this.
Why should anyone care, and why do you deflect to this with less integrity than literal Nazis, who use the same blood and soil arguments you do, but at least tend to own their genocidal positions?
Imagine claiming history has spanned a total of 75 years and that an attempted invasion at the beginning of time justifies a genocide in progress today.
Pointing to an ongoing genocide isn't the same as saying citizens of the state committing that genocide deserved it.
That said, it's interesting though not at all surprising that you're running right past the tens of thousands that Israel have killed to cry victim about the couple of hundred that Hamas killed.
My guy, I'm truly sorry to hear the state you're in, and hope you get the care you need soon without it crippling you financially.
I'm not sure what your options are for visiting a neighbouring country that doesn't have the worst cost/outcome ratio in the world bar none, but that may be worth researching.
Do you think a government-mandated exception for dire circumstances is a meaningful counter-argument to the fact that the healthcare system is run for profit not care - even as you acknowledge the gaps in care created by affordability?
The US healthcare system doesn't exist to provide healthcare - it exists to provide profits for shareholders. Any positive health outcomes provided are a fortunate byproduct - they certainly won't be delivered if they're unprofitable.
Of course, the same is true of any product under capitalism, but US health is a stark example.
So the EU isn't allowed to cooperate with a country (that's at least part of the single market and contiguous continent), because they saw no value in including Britain, and that was a scheming betrayal?
This is an inevitability when economic power is functionally political power. It bleeds our democracy out and hurts everyone (including the billionaires - not that I'm inclined to care and their willfully self-inflicted suffering).
Union contracts leave things less open to interpretation, union advice helps employees understand that this is a legal issue, and coordinated legal action and representation help you win the fight in court.
Leaving it to individual employees to individually see the problem, recognise they have legal standing, then fight Phoney Stark's infestation of lawyers isn't super-realistic, and turns the employment contracts into nothing more than a weapon to fuck with the employees, because Musk can just ignore anything in the contract favourable to employees.
You understand that while this would give better results, this is an example of the problem under discussion - you're deferring to businesses listed on Google, washed with Google reviews and promotion. Businesses that don't actively try/pay to work with Google functionally don't exist - they are the gatekeeper, toll collector, marketplace, and the arbiter of good and bad. They don't do this altruistically or honestly - they do it for profit, and the crashing quality of their search results is evidence of this.