How do you know that what you consider "literal monkey could do it" is not something many other people struggle with?
As a kid i struggled a lot understanding, why people didn't get the math we dealt with in high school, but i lacked behind in languages, not getting that you have to study for them and can't just "get" them like with math.
letting non-Democrats get into power does not do anything to hurt the politicians
Are the Democrats not politicians then? Are they not seeking power then? Also what makes you believe that now they support a genocide against brown people and in four years they wouldn't support killing LGBT+ ?
There’s no incentive for them to change course now.
If people say: "Stop the genocide, or we will not vote you" there is plenty of incentive to change course now. But people arguing the opposite, claiming it is pointless and that the people have no power are diminishing the power of the people. This is why the DNC is pushing this narrative so heavily. They want you to be demotivated and feeling powerless. It is the same strategy like with the oil companies and climate change.
There is still 5 months until the election. 5 months in which the current DNC leaders can be pressured to change course.
Don't buy their bullshit that you have no power over them. I fully agree with you to organize though. Make your voices heard with them, but tell them fair and square that there is no vote for genocide supporters.
Al-Mawasi was already attacked before. Also it has an official population of about 1,500 people. So that makes the population increase by factor 200, Obviously this is a complete disaster because there is no way that any makeshift infrastructure can take such an increase in population.
For reference imagine that a quarter of the world population would move to NYC tomorrow. That is the factor we are talking about here.
We don't. But when Israel announced on the 10. October that they will starve the population, that their focus is on damage, that they are fighting "Human animals" and that they don't see any uninvolved civilians, that was the moment to stop it. And every single day since was a good moment to stop it. And form there on he holds full responsibility.
We must never forget that the US accepted and supported through their actions the Lebensraum expansion of illegal terror settlements into the occupied Palestinian territories.
The obvious truth is, that the Dems can end this genocide, force Israel to hand over all its war criminals and establish a Palestinian state. and gain all the support for it. The fact that they rather want a genocide to continue shows you that they rather want Trump to win, than to not take AIPAC money.
And they successfully gaslighted the people into believing it is their fault, instead of the fault of the leaders that can end this genocide right fucking now.
Sure, if everyone agreed to vote for a single third party, it could happen. That’s not going to happen though
And by repeating this mantra you protect the system and the systems parties against change. From a mass psychological point this is brilliant and the same play that the Sovjet Union and other regimes played and play. Break peoples spirit so they defend their own opression as they cannot envision anything outside of it.
Genocide, Climate catastrophe, Internment Camps at the Border, Police and state racism... All the little stuff.
Instead of holding the Dems accountable and offering them to win you back by actually adressing issues, you give them a free pass not to adress any issue you care about. They care about losing power. They don't care about what you want. Threatening to take away their power is the only thing that makes them listen to you.
We don't want Trump to win. We want an end to the genocide and justice for the Palestinian people. Why do the Dems and you prefer Trump to win over ending a fucking genocide?
The administration had every chance and still has every chance to end this genocide and work towards justice. They choose every day to let it continue, giving token pledges at best.
Well is he the President? Is he the leader of the government? Is he the one that continues to pledge weapons and money to Israel and continue to block Palestine at the UN? Is he the one that held back the state department report on Israeli war crimes committed with US weapons and now had it toned down to "yeah we think they did, but we aren't entirely sure." Is he the one whose ambassador recently assured the Israeli government that he is a fully convinced Zionist? Is he the one that made bogus claims about antisemitism and violent protests?
Or is he just some poor slop that has nothing to do with all of this?
Oh they do care. They want to distract from real antisemitism. They want real antisemitism to flourish.
Zionism is a fascist ideology and it needs its followers and the people under its control to be in a perpetual state of existential fear and delusion of grandeur.
it is not about it being hard. It simply creates effort to coordinate. And this effort needs to be considered. If you do things externally that means there is two PMs to pay, you need QMs on both sides, you need two legal/contract teams, you need to pay someone in procurement and someone in sales...
I agree with you that doing software inhouse when there is good options on the market is usually not a good idea. But for infrastructure i don't see there to be as much of an efficiency loss. Especially as you very much need experts on how to set things up in a cloud environment and you better look carefully at how many resources you need to not overpay huge amounts.
If you are a small company then yes. But i would argue that for larger companies this doesn't hold true. If you have 200 employees you'll need an IT department either way. You need IT expertise either way. So having some people who know how to plan, implement and maintain physical hardware makes sense too.
There is a breaking point between economics of scale and the added efforts to coordinate between your company and the service provider plus paying that service providers overhead and profits.
I ran my old machine also from 2010 till this year on 8gb. Also for gaming the 2010 i7 was quite fine. The only bottleneck was the VRAM where we somehow went from 1GB being perfectly suitable to 4GB being barely enough. Meanwhile old games sometimes look better than modern games, because they actually put effort into optimizing the graphics.
How do you know that what you consider "literal monkey could do it" is not something many other people struggle with?
As a kid i struggled a lot understanding, why people didn't get the math we dealt with in high school, but i lacked behind in languages, not getting that you have to study for them and can't just "get" them like with math.