Sentau @ Sentau @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

14

Comments

774

Joined

2 yr. ago

What do you mean F1 now is like getting edged for an hour and a half? What specific era would you prefer going back to?

People see the past with rose tinted glasses. The only reason races used to have several different winners in the past was because reliability used to be atrocious which meant that even in a season with a dominant car, others would win a several times through attrition.

What used to worse was that the field spread used to be massive (4-5 seconds) and only the top 6 used to get points so even the midfield used to boring.

Yes while we are seeing more dominant runs and less variation in winners, the general quality of racing has improved.

Looks cool

Wow. Hamilton has jumped ship at the right time

Here you go

Poor mechanic who holds the light panel had to jump out of the way

Did they actually apply another 5 secs or is this the document for the 1st time penalty¿? Because his race time on the f1 website indicates that he received only one 5 sec penalty

A driver just going without being released by the team? Sounds like BS to me personally

The number of upvotes you are getting for this when both the onboard footage and the FIA document show that Perez went out even though is the light was red is scary.

Review and possibly change the rule for the future. Admit that the way the rule was written is not good enough.

Buddy you seem lost. This is a community for a Lemmy client called Voyager.

Irrespective of if you are lost, asking this on a gaming centric community like !gaming@lemmy.world or !gaming@lemmy.ml would be more appropriate and more likely to get you good recommendations/answers

Norris didn't get any advantage. On the contrary, he had to abandon the start and start again later than everyone around him.

This is not an excuse to ignore a case where there is clear visual evidence of a car moving before lights out. His movement could have spooked other cars into moving which could have ruined their starts. You can see people making jump starts in response to other jump starts often in athletics especially in short races like 100m, etc.

Also it was not a case where he drifted just a few mm. He moved nearly half a wheel rotation in that false start and somehow the transponder either didn't pick it or found it to be within limits. Either the way the transponder sensitivity has to be improved.

Yeah, his bad start was punishment enough in this instance.

I was responding to this

I am not saying lando should be punished. I am saying that the rule should be reviewed and updated for the future to handle cases technology cannot/ fails to handle.

That the rule having no flexibility is stupid. It is obvious from the videos that Norris jumped the start but because the rules are based purely on the signals from the transponder, he has escaped punishment.

And that is what i am trying to highlight through my question. The rule is enforced completely based on the transponder but if its malfunctioning then drivers will not be penalized as the the transponder has not picked up their jump start.

No as in there won't be a penalty or no as in there will be a penalty¿?

So if the transponder is faulty(hypothetically) or just not sensitive enough, does that mean people will get away with false starts¿?

That is not how the sport works though. Magnussen also had floor damage from his collision with Albon which fucked his race but he still got a penalty for his transgression.

But now people can try and abuse this to start rolling just before the lights go out while staying within the box. If timed well or controlled well, this could give a massive advantage at the start.

I am aware of this. He moved an awful in the race so I don't get how he didn't cross the sensor. He looked past the white line when the lights went out.

The above comment is referring to Austria 2017 where bottas made an incredible start. It was certain he had predicted the lights and not reacted. He started moving almost simultaneously with the light going out.

I think the rule of thumb is if you catch it and stop before starting again you're broadly OK.

This is not the rule. The rule as it currently exists is completely based on if the sensor detects movements which are greater than the amount specified by the regs. If Norris had started moving 0.05 seconds before lights out but moved a low enough distance as to not trigger the sensor, it is considered a legal start even if he made no attempt to 'catch it'.