It's the response of a person who thinks you're having a conversation with someone else that you think you're having with me, based on the not-quite-on-topic nature of your posting.
For instance, my first sentence in this entire comment section is
We’re honestly not at a point where UBI is sustainable.
Worth noting that a gram of coke currently goes for a nationwide average of around 100-150 USD in Switzerland, and about 200-250 in the US, per the data I looked up.
Different supply levels of and ease of access to various drugs make them comparatively more or less expensive. Combine that will a user base of above-average wealth and it makes sense.
I agree regarding the absolute value of the two drugs though. Coke is fine, I suppose, but nothing I want to shell out the money for - but then again, I'm not in Switzerland so who knows.
It's weird that you think this would scare me. Like do you not get that? That's the central conceit here - we fundamentally disagree on the idea "Muslims are scary"
Besides, the system worked perfectly fine for norwegians
Back in topic, in your own words, your system is a failure to what I see as basic human rights, so no, it didn't work perfectly.
If your culture cannot survive immigrants, your culture has no value. That's what a "war of ideas" is. That's why Iran and North Korea don't allow immigrants.
For clarity, I have said and will say again this exact same thing to every American who disagrees too. If some aspect of "being American" cannot survive immigration, then it doesn't deserve to exist.
My hot take here is that Brave New World shouldn't be read by high schoolers because it's too complex for most high schoolers.
The book is most definitely not about how "bread and circuses" distract people from an encroaching dystopian hellstate and the number of grown-ass adults I see parroting that is too damn high. See the other comment to your post.
It's instead about how a lack of agency from ongoing institutions already paves the way for dystopian hellstates, and the industrialization of that loss of agency is the core concept discussed in the first chapter. That's why they just ship the main character off to an island with the other people who have figured things out - the dystopia is such that the machine breaks immediately if anyone questions it, so they just let those people go live how they wish.
It shouldn't be banned though, because no books should ever be banned.
If interest rates went up, crippling demand for new housing, this is a temporary "burst" at best. Their economy is in the trash can right now, and that means demand is artificially low.
The second their economy rebounds they'll be back in the same situation.
I think you should have a good long think with yourself about the very personal meaning this statement should have for you