Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SC
Posts
0
Comments
4,658
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Lol when I was 17, during my mom's divorce of us, she told me she wishes she hadn't had kids because she didn't get to party enough.

    So now I have 3 kids and I'm a swinger, best of both worlds.

    Things worked out

  • The United States Code, under Section 811 of Title 21,[24] sets out a process by which cannabis could be administratively transferred to a less-restrictive category or removed from Controlled Substances Act regulation altogether. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) evaluates petitions to reschedule cannabis. However, the Controlled Substances Act gives the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as successor agency of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, great power over rescheduling decisions.

    After the DEA accepts the filing of a petition, the agency must request from the HHS Secretary "a scientific and medical evaluation, and his recommendations, as to whether such drug or other substance should be so controlled or removed as a controlled substance." The Secretary's findings on scientific and medical issues are binding on the DEA.[25] The HHS Secretary can even unilaterally legalize cannabis: "[I]f the Secretary recommends that a drug or other substance not be controlled, the Attorney General shall not control the drug or other substance." 21 U.S.C. § 811(b).

    Biden could theoretically pressure the HHS secretary to do that, but that would directly be a Trumpian act of a guy who ran on "look how not-Trump I am" and just is not going to happen.

    Biden will use the system, as designed, and hope the chips land his way. If they don't, and public backlash is strong, Dems can safely run on it.

    We can not like how the political sausage is made, or even like that said sausage is made, and still live in the reality in which one does have to make sausage in politics.

    Maybe if the world didn't catch fire right before his election, this could be a thing, but with the past four to six years I just don't see it taking anything but an act of Congress

  • But he’s too fucking old. He’s made mistakes, and handling Israel with kid gloves is a problem.

    I believe we disagree on a few of his policy choices, and what we find good or bad. Democrats are a pretty big tent

    I agree with your other points, at least conceptually. They're good reasons.

  • 1: You weren’t a fan of any of the other candidates as human beings?

    No I absolutely love Booker and Buttigiege especially.

    2: You figured they weren’t up to the job?

    No I just preferred Biden, especially with his history both in the Senate and as VP to Obama, dealing with a very hostile Congress as I expected he would during his term.

    3: You didn’t like their policies?

    I do not agree 100% with any politician's policies. I think Biden is way too protectionist, as an example of a place we agree in vision.

    I figure he holds those views because of his passion for "the little guy" and his generalized support of unions, but it's a place we generally disagree. You gotta take the good with the bad. Shit, Buttigieg spoke in favor of rent control and I still like him a ton. He's a good guy. He can be wrong sometimes.

    Booker has more views that I don't like than most, but damn if I don't like that he can get shit done with, again, heavily entrenched interests who hate one another. He never really had a shot, but I just like the dude.

    Happy to answer any more questions.

  • If you really think China and Taiwan should fight to death to determine who’s the true ruler than I think that’s pretty fucked up.

    I think Taiwan should wait out authoritarian communism's inevitable collapse and then come to the rescue with real solutions.