How depressing. Makes me wonder if that's part of the reason I'm struggling to switch careers, because though I'm well qualified for my desired role - I don't fit the stereotypical career history.
I mean, Lemmy has the exact same potential for issues with admins and mods - the key difference being that if those issues happen you can just up and off to another instance without having to abandon Lemmy altogether.
Resorting to name calling is a sure way to indicate you've been backed into a logical corner, and don't want to challenge your own beliefs, so you have to denigrate your opponent.
If reddit is anything to go by, which I expect it is, people don't click through to the article. But they see the headline and the news platform and take that as evidence enough.
I wonder whether news not being on social media is almost better? It prevents that behaviour, meaning less impact from inflammatory and sensationalised headlines, and forces consumers that actually want news to go and find it directly - in the process being more likely to actually read an article and be more informed.
Your argument here is that - based on one study suggesting that balanitis falls from 3-11% of males to 2-7.5% of genitally-mutilated males justifies the systemic mutilation of all males in the US?
This is not a medically or scientifically sound argument.
Yes. Reductive in a crude way, not clarifying. I don't think the parent comment at all implied humans are inherently bad and the occasional good doesn't matter.
Rather inversely, humans are tribalistic but achieve good in spite of tribalism.
Lemmy.world has not defederated lemmy.ml
You should edit your post; you're spreading disinformation.