Risk @ Risk @feddit.uk

Posts

9

Comments

442

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's extra funny considering the pace in Hot Fuzz is super snappy. And Hot Fuzz is definitely their masterpiece.

Posts are not being marked as read, unless the comments are opened.

It was a me problem. I had been logged out and not noticed. I am so sorry.

@emperor@feddit.uk - is this a me problem or a feddit.uk problem?

I learnt that over a decade ago.

Don't buy a Ubisoft, EA, or frankly any big publisher game.

Oh no way - awesome and thank you.

Edit: still won't work for me. Are we sure it's not a user error on my end or is this really the right way to fetch a remote instance?

I hate how awkward it always seems to be trying to fetch a remote community.

What am I doing wrong?

please correct me if I'm wrong

Okay :)

For which version though?

I lost access to my original copy because I completely missed the Microsoft shenanigans of account transfering due to not playing for 10+ years.

Kind of feel cheated as I recently got the itch to play again and was unable.

Any recommendation of the best way to play Minecraft now? I'm not particularly keen on rebuying it :/

Me and my wife... Got really bored. The gameplay loop is supppperr trivial, and even though they add in stuff every now and again, eh...

I dunno, it's okay - but I just don't get the hype. I wanted to pitch in because if someone is considering buying it I'd really recommend checking a Let's Play of it before trying it.

It felt like a game specifically designed for a gamer to introduce gaming to their never-gamed-before partner. If you're both experienced gamers like we are, I wonder whether you'd give up on it too.

TIL thanks.

What's the difference?

Sir, this is a shitpost.

Oh no!

Anyway...

Perhaps I should have said 'categorically' instead of 'definitively', but they are synonyms so...

IIRC, the only definitive way to ID mushrooms is by making a spore print - and even then you need to know what you're doing.

Just doesn't seem worth the risk to me.

Pugilistic - TIL a new word!

No worries. What I'd give to shoot the person that came up with the FPTP voting system...

I feel like you took my comment to be a critique of the EU's position, which is not what I was trying to say at all.

I presume that such an agreement would be in the EUs interest - hence the expression of such. Public clarification at this stage of the 'cost'- as you put it - is a great way to take it off the official policy booklet. Which doesn't make sense to me.

I am aware that UK politics is stupid. I live here.

If the move would be of interest to the EU, then unless they are completely politically inept, can these officials not see how saying it would require ECJ oversight before an election risks it being eliminated from Labour policy?

It gives a free attack point for the Tories and couldn't be a bigger face palm - for anyone actually interested in it, of course.