Nonameuser678 @ Nonameuser678 @aussie.zone

Posts

15

Comments

362

Joined

2 yr. ago

Part of me liked being love bombed. Through therapy I've been able to understand that this part of me is the traumatized child who desperately needed love.

You've obviously never had a riveting conversation with a cat. They're quite pleasant to converse with if you know how to engage with them.

I actually think community based sustainability is going to be a huge in demand area as climate change worsens. Depending on how much you want to sell your soul to the capitalist machine, there will be plenty of work opportunities in helping companies implement sustainability initiatives.

Also, social work and community development are widely applicable across the human services industry. You could get a job in government or not for profit organisations. In order to qualify as a social worker you'd probably have to do a masters, but there's plenty of community based roles that you can get into with a bachelors.

Our first nation's people are one of the oldest cultures in the world which is really amazing if you consider just how harsh the country is to live in.

A lot of people who don't grow up here don't know this though. I used to go on trips to the beach with my international student friends and they had no idea what those flags are and why you should swim between them.

In Australia it's not just knowing how to swim but where to swim and when. A lot of tourists drown in the ocean here because they don't know how to read the waves / don't have an understanding of the local area.

I agree with this statement but thought I'd have a go at challenging it just for fun. The nature of profits and wages is relative to whether or not a business model requires workers to make profit. For example some companies make money off of owning the result of a worker's labor (patents, software, creative work etc) rather than their ongoing labor. So while not all profits are necessarily unpaid wages, they are still dependent on the exchange of labor.

I would have thought it would be the opposite but there you go.

Star trek

It's worth noting that this current Labor government brought in the human rights act in 2019. So not only are they suspending the human rights act, they're undermining their own reforms.

I was so excited about the human rights act when it passed. I remember thinking fuck yes qld is actually moving in a more progressive direction and while this act likely won't stop human rights abuses, it will at least give people a leg to stand on in fighting for their rights. In retrospect I regret being so optimistic about this.

Yep and I'm not looking forward to the sort of bullshit arguments people will espouse in opposing a truth telling process.

These parliamentarians don't necessarily represent or advocate for Indigenous Australians as they represent everyone in their electorate. Anthony Albanese doesn't just represent the Italians in his electorate, he represents everyone. That's how majority based systems work. The majority based system is a problem when you have a minority group who are so disadvantaged and have limited ways of having their voices heard. Especially when it's about policies and laws that affect them specifically.

I wish I got to vote in the Republic referendum. What was the rhetoric like in comparison to the current one? Did anyone make a fuss about the ticks and crosses thing?

Ok cool. You do you, I'll do me. There's no need to attack each other's approach to decision making.

Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint and it's not my place to say what is or isn't a good approach to change in this space. The progressive no campaign is connected to the Indigenous sovereignty movement and I can understand why they have taken the position they have. I'm not an Indigenous person so I don't feel like it's appropriate for me to try and represent their ideas. But I don't think it's fair to close yourself off to them, especially when the principle of the voice should is about listening to the diversity of Indigenous perspectives.

This is the first referendum voting experience for me so I'm excited to be part of history even if the outcome is not the one I want. I'm personally in the critical yes camp where I hope the referendum is successful but still agree with the points raised by the progressive no campaign. I was unsure for a while because I'm not an Indigenous person and wanted to listen to as many different Indigenous perspectives as I could before deciding. What really pushed me to yes was the idea that while not every person who votes no is racist, all racists will vote no.

The worst case scenario for them is that marginalised groups might start getting a greater say over the policies and laws that affect them. If Indigenous Australians are awarded more power in a system that is designed to keep them powerless then who knows what other groups in a similar situation of powerlessness might start getting uppity about.

The conservative no campaign don't want to change the status quo because they don't have a problem with it. Shit's working fine in their view. The yes campaign and progressive no campaign agree that the status quo is not good enough but disagree about how it needs to be changed.

If you read the conservative no campaign's brochure one of the concerns that they have about the voice is that it opens the door to activism. I personally think that is the foundation of their position and everything else is just incoherent fluff to wrap it up in.

I agree with you but don't understand why the government isn't more concerned about losing the referendum. The voice is a key agenda item and they've committed their first term to it. Not that losing the referendum will automatically mean they lose the election, but it still looks pretty bad for your legacy if you fail to achieve such an important agenda item. The polls have not been painting a good picture and the no campaign has been more effective than it should be considering how fucking batshit it is.

This is also on the Greens as well. Even though the majority of their voters are voting yes, the Greens still have a lot of experience with grass roots campaigning that could be advantageous here. Labor also need to focus on the 30% of their voters who say they're voting no. Bringing half of these voters around could make all the difference and lnp no voters are kind of a lost cause at this point.

Y'all really need to reform your voting system. We have a preferential system over here in Australia. It's not perfect but it feels like our democracy is a lot more robust and diverse because of it.

I'm a phd student so I'll just stick with my university library databases.