NewNewAccount @ NewNewAccount @lemmy.world

Posts

12

Comments

746

Joined

2 yr. ago

because companies pollute much more

This argument drives me crazy. Companies, in this context, are the people. The companies pollute exclusively on behalf of their customers. WE ARE THE COMPANIES.

Both Microsoft and Nvidia are multi-trillion dollar companies.

They’re both horrible but the NY Post is far more tabloid-y than Fox News proper.

It was difficult, but not impossible to get one at launch. Prices on the secondhand market are also not as inflated as we saw with the PS5 launch or even the original Switch.

I managed to get one preordered and felt lucky in doing so but I think I would have managed to get one in person had I not gotten a preorder.

It was nowhere near just as bad as other launches. Not even close.

Why don’t you want us to have weird dinosaurs?

Why do you dislike the Switch 2?

What about retirement? Not continuing to save for retirement during your 20s and 30s is a recipe for absolute disaster for long-term stability. What about saving for a down payment for a house?

“Boomers” don’t like this because it seems incredibly short-sighted.

Umberto Eco’s third tenet of fascism: The cult of action for action’s sake.

“Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”

Hence the desire for SteamOS.

Motivation on this one was supposedly anti-population increase and anti-IVF. Doesn’t sound like your typical right-wing terrorist.

No, we knew it was fascism then too.

This has got to be in a chintzy tourist town.

Fucking libtards

Wondering how this is going to play out. A Switch for $600+ is borderline insane.

But we’re middle-aged now. Harder every day to focus up close.

It’s SPY with volume. Very standard chart for probably the biggest ETF tracking the S&P.

Hey, it doesn’t need to be right this instant. It could instead be projected revenue next quarter.

All of those are overhead-riddled runarounds that could be avoided entirely by the state simply allocating the tax dollars it's already collected in a different manner, which ought to be well within its capability to do.

Are you saying that problems could be fixed simply by better allocating existing taxes? That’s what it sounds like. Tax revenue collected from gasoline sales is bound to drop as less and less ICE vehicles are used. Something will have to compensate for that drop.

Are large EVs actually worse for the environment compared to an equivalent sized ICE vehicle? I find that hard to believe.