Nachorella @ Nachorella @lemmy.sdf.org

Just a silly feller

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

383

Joined

2 yr. ago

You can be negative if you want but this is still a step in the right direction.

At least now they actually have to weigh up the costs, before it was free.

I'm sure that plays a part, but I'm going off this link which seems more based on individual actions than overall donation amounts.

Wowee, yet another LLM. I bet this one's going to be super different somehow.

If you imagine the log as someone laying down with their head furthest from you and they are looking up at you. It stands out quite a bit to me but I have bad eyes and am tired.

edit:

is that creepy face I see intentional? Lovely shot either way.

One thing I really don't understand about America is how it's one of the most charitable countries on earth - but when it comes to proven government run charity there is usually strong pushback.

Like I understand how it happens I just wish people would evaluate their politicians more and think about whether or not their values actually align.

I appreciate your maths but you'd be pretty surprised how much stuff can fit in that area. I probably also live in a very ideal spot in my city, it's certainly not the case for everywhere. I'm pretty much right between a suburb full of housing and our 'nightlife' area. And the inner city where I work is just next to that. I am not exaggerating that I can get to work on my (e) bike in 15 minutes. And there's heaps of things in that area. It's a big place, though, so sometimes I do need to get an uber but I often go weeks and months without needing to.

I used to live in a very car dependent city and now I'm somewhere that I can easily walk or bike anywhere I need and get there within 15 minutes and I am very grateful for that. Our biking and public transport infrastructure keeps getting improvements, too, which is awesome.

If they want people to use their cars less they need to start making that an actual option. This is not on the individuals but the government.

People are pretty predictable ultimately, we take the path of least resistance most of the time. If it's quicker or cheaper or easier to do something one way then we'll do it that way.

I just feel incredibly angry all of a sudden.

true dinosaur fan

I guess it is quite striking, it's a shame any are killed under bad conditions.

For those unaware, the usual process is something like this: graphic video warning

Animal agriculture kills something like 200 million chickens a day. They all live short miserable lives anyway, this hardly stands out to me.

Is there any actual weight to this talk of campaign interference? I heard it somewhere else, too. It just seems absurd to me that that would be considered at all. Like if I did a few felonies but was like: your honor, I've got to water my plants. so you see - I can't do any prison time.

I watched a documentary about Alex Jones' court case with the Sandy Hook victims and he did the exact same thing. In court he does nothing, but as soon as he's back in front of a camera he's straight back to peddling lies and crying injustice.

That is awesome, nice work.

I can respect that. I was once where you are and one day I just decided I couldn't justify it anymore. Now I only eat sticks and moss.

But if you wanna try making some vegan food my advice is just don't overthink it, make some pasta and just pan fry some veggies you like and mix 'em through with some olive oil. It's always a tasty time.

That's probably smart. Even with important things I don't think online arguments have ever swayed anyone. I like being an annoying vegan and arguing about it occasionally, but sometimes it's just frustrating and I have to disconnect for a while.

I wish more men could read and understand points of views like this.

I'm not starving and I don't eat meat. I just pay more for my food even though it costs less to produce. We should be incentivising more sustainable choices, because unless we scale down animal ag we all actually will starve.