MysticKetchup @ MysticKetchup @lemmy.world

Posts

13

Comments

239

Joined

2 yr. ago

Seems like a normal, sane and totally not-biased source

If anything this is an overly optimistic representation of consumerism given that they limit work to 8 hours and encourage 8 hours of play

Even if the courts eventually shoot down his bullshit orders eventually, they're not allowed to stop him from enforcing them until the case is over, except against the specific plaintiffs in their court.

So assuming that his birthright citizenship order is defeated, as soon as the SCOTUS 30-day pause is up, he can start stripping people of citizenship and deporting them right away. If that order is overturned? Then he'll have to deal with whatever the court says he needs to do, but he'll still have destroyed a bunch of people's lives in the process

Assuming we actually get another regular presidential election, the future of this country is going to depend heavily on whether or not the next president is willing to take extreme measures to correct a court that has repeatedly shown that it's okay to do blatantly illegal and unconstitutional shit as long as you're a Republican

The point of that is to allow risky projects the opportunity to succeed in comfortable financial circumstances.

Risky projects are risky because there's a potential financial loss to funding them. This is one of those times

Cases like this abuse the system to scam people while using the ToS to skirt legal implications. So it is fraud, just dressed up as a gambling.

If they put all the KS money towards the game unsure how it's fraud. The fact that they couldn't finish with the funding they got from KS is the risk that all KS projects come with

Again, it's not a preorder site, there is no guarantee that someone who pledges on KS will receive anything. I'm just saying to adjust your expectations and pledgers should think about the risk when they're putting down money

Kickstarter is not a preorder site. The risk of Kickstarter is the same as investing in anything else, that whatever you're funding goes belly-up and you lose what you invested

Yeah this screams "Let's use AI for the sake of using AI". If they wanted simpler summaries on complex topics they could just start an initiative to have them added by editors instead of using a wasteful, inaccurate hype machine

They want cultists though. Easier to exploit

Heh, almost missed that the initials are BFG

Oh it's undoubtedly going to fail, but it should milk enough money out of their users to keep them going while their investors cash out

Except it seems like every time a major area ceases water fluoridation the caries immediately increases compared to nearby areas. Until we see some hard benefits from removing fluoride from water that exceeds the benefits of fluoridation there's no point in giving in to the fearmongering of conspiracy theorists

What in the AI hell is that image?

1. One moderator from fosstodon is not 100% aligned to the prevailing ideology on Fedi.

For clarity's sake, the views the mod expressed were:

• Calling criticism of Mahmoud Khalil's arrest and transfer to Louisiana "yellow journalism" for using the phrase "disappeared"
• Defending the striking down of a school privacy policy that requires teachers get consent from LGBTQ+ kids before outing them to their parents
• Removing posts about surveillance of LGBTQ+ people in r/privacy for contradictory or unexplained reasons

3. The mob went on to presume that someone that is not 100% aligned to their prevailing ideology is unfit to be considered human - let alone a moderator - so they went after the admins.

Is all criticism now a "mob" just because they don't want people with anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ+ views to have the power to censor others?

4. The admins claimed to have reviewed said mod actions, didn't find anything out of the ordinary, but still got rid of them.

From what I saw, the admins actually said that they were fine with keeping him on the moderation team and the mod deleted their own accounts

6. Less-principled users of fosstodon are now just leaving the instance, for fear of being associated with them.

Are they? The most I saw was that people were considering leaving because other instances were going to start blocking Fosstodon

What is with the concealing and downplaying of the mod's views and then exaggerating the "outrage" of the "mob"? Yes the Fediverse can be drama-prone but most of the fanning of the flames seems to be coming from the people complaining about Fedi users genuine criticisms of the mods/admins on Fosstodon

I don't think it's unreasonable to remove mod privileges for these kinds of views if you're trying to run an inclusive space. There's supported suspicion that they've used their mod powers to censor information on minorities already, just because they haven't done it yet on this platform doesn't mean you let them lie in wait to do it. Makes me worry that Fosstodon admins don't see any issues keeping someone like that around

Would this get the same kind of backlash had the mod been kicked out for tankie views?

I'm sure they're less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome's market share

As a Forza Horizon fan my curiosity is piqued. I like being able to shift vibes from an intense race to just cruising around the landscape, and Mario Kart is a very different style of racing so it'd be a very different experience

People are reading the headline and assuming they're talking about older single-purchase games, but the article is actually referring to mostly MTX-driven games that get continuous updates.

And the data further shows, in Newzoo's own words, that these 908 million "PC players are heavily skewed towards older, live service games."

Remember that even things like Rocket League are about a decade old at this point, and games like LoL, Dota 2 and CS:GO are even older

Except they haven't actually backed that up with a way for you to jump servers. If the central Bsky server goes down, it takes the network with it. Until they actually let other people host, it's just meaningless posturing. Without a way for people to leave their network you are as captive there as you are on Twitter

It's literally worse than piracy, since the AI companies are also trying to sell shittier versions of the works they copy from

Like selling camrips except done by multi-billion dollar companies ripping off individuals and stores are trying to put them right next to the original DVDs in the store

So according to Republicans the FCC shouldn't have the power to regulate net neutrality but it should be able to force streaming companies to carry specific programming.

Time for some Satanists to start some public broadcasting?