MountingSuspicion @ MountingSuspicion @reddthat.com

Posts

1

Comments

395

Joined

2 yr. ago

The whole point of ethics is that violating it makes it inherently unworthy. There were other safe and known methods for these children and my understanding is there is no guarantee that what he did would be effective.

He did it to make a name for himself. He's not some rogue doctor illegally manufacturing and distributing insulin to diabetics who can't afford it, he's a self important narcissist who thought he could do what he wanted and that he was above the law.

My understanding is that there were known, safe and effective alternatives already and that there is not guarantee what he did actually did anything or that it didn't cause some unknown harm.

Highly disagree. Are you in the states? Our guidelines are actually pretty sensible and the process is pretty inclusive. What kind of research do you do. I know some research that doesn't "need" review still has to go through the process, but I'd rather the net be cast wide.

Yea, I didn't bother to futz with my settings to make it load, but just based off the headline I couldn't imagine it being a paid article, but that tracks honestly. These people have no sense of decency or propriety. What happened to tact and shame lol. It's gross.

Oh weird. I can't get it to load fully so I can't tell, but I don't doubt it. I was just curious what company would possibly want their product associated with this.

I'm very glad to hear that. I think it will long term be good for users and other companies (in that one sense, America going crazy isn't good for anyone). Smaller non American companies will be getting more business and it will make the market more competitive. A lot of these other companies will maybe be more incentivized to prioritize privacy because it's cheap to offer and a good selling point. I also think companies will see that supporting a fascist regime is not actually making them rich and they will be less likely to support far right candidates elsewhere.

I had a family member call me because they were having difficulty with a light switch. They're not dumb, just set in their ways and can't be bothered to learn something else. Plenty of these people don't like change just because it's different. They got confused when windows started doing the rotating desktop pictures because they didn't realize it was still their desktop. Do I think they could eventually use Linux? Probably. Do I want to deal with even more questions? No. Could they install it themselves? Absolutely not without help.

I'm American and I've told all my friends that if they do not have an up to date passport they need to get one immediately and carry a photocopy with them at all times. It's legitimately frightening. I have travel coming up that was booked before the election and I am extremely concerned about it. I'm a citizen and so were my parents. This is not the sign of a functioning country. Stay very far away. Do not buy our products or support our big businesses.

An ad for what?

Like so many things, it really depends on what you're doing. I've worked a lot of different jobs, and some absolutely require a numpad and some I've never touched it. What people really need is programmable keyboards. If you need a numpad you don't have to even move your hands if you program it right. Same with function keys. It's better for you long term. So I'd actually suggest a smaller but programmable keyboard for everyone, even if they don't use the numpad, plenty of great features on these keyboards.

Did you respond to the wrong person?

I don't follow influencers, but I'm not really sure what the problem is here. You're upset that someone has a job? That's like saying: Plumbers engaging with plumbing / plumbers engaging with people who can pay them. Like yea, it's their job to advertise to you. That's why they do things. Plumbers don't do it for the love of the game, and neither do influencers. Everyone needs to eat. If you like their content then you should be ok with ads, unless you're paying them directly.

Honestly, even if you thought it was a Chinese bio weapon, he did a terrible job managing it. If anything it makes him bad at managing public health AND espionage.

Thanks for the link! Really surprising stats including "At case disposition, 65% of persons ages 12 to 17 charged with a felony in adult criminal courts were convicted, compared to 25% of persons charged with a misdemeanor."

Def don't link to your research. It's bad opsec lol. In this case I do feel like mock trials would give a better indication as to the actual effect, seeing as in actual cases there'd be so much to account for. Really sad to hear this is the effect shown even in the research you did with mock trials.

The belief is that one should vote for a person or party because they align with your morals. They voted against their conscience because a whole host of people told them that not to would be to condemn even more. And so they voted to prolong a genocide and now they stand without conviction or protection for their allies they gave up those convictions for. Maybe to you voting is a box you check, but for a lot of people it is a statement of their morals and beliefs. That gun to their head they would not sell out their international comrades for luxuries at home. They sold out their neighbors to protect their family and someone is still coming for their family anyway. Say what you want about "harm reduction" but voting for genocide is voting for genocide. They did so and gained nothing except an inability to say they stood for something. Harris paraded around Liz and promised to be tough on immigration. Who was that for? It certainly was not to reassure leftists that she super secretly didn't want to help murder people abroad.

Clearly we have very different understandings of the world. I've never seen a self proclaimed "proud democrat" at any actual level of organizing. Maybe the women's march admittedly had a lot of democrats show up, but actual organizers that I engage with are self proclaimed leftist who "vote" democrat but do not identify as one. If a nonbinary person checks their assigned gender at birth on a form with just M/F, that doesn't mean they align or self identify with that. It's just the options they were presented with. M4A, the fight for a living wage, and LGBT rights have all been championed by leftists before liberals could get together enough to stop using racial slurs. I've been hearing "lib" from the left since obama was in office, but I checked and urban dictionary has an entry from 2005 attacking them from the left, claiming libs are defined as fake progressives who actually don't care about leftist causes. That's popular usage for at least two decades. Maybe there's an age or geography difference that is the cause of this disconnect, but around me most refugee assistance is organized by anarchists and most food aid is organized by socialists. It's not cliquelike, as there's plenty of crossover, but what I don't see is a large contingent of run of the mill democrats actually helping anyone. If you are so concerned about how leftists vote, go work with them wearing your I'm With Her merch. Let them see some libs actually doing something.

I lol'd. Thanks.

My point is that I know leftists who think the system is broken and corrupt and would have abstained or voted 3rd party as they have previously, and specifically did not in this election or in trumps previous elections. Literally nothing changed except they budged on their beliefs and got nothing in return. This idea that they should vote for dems because the alternative is fascism is terrible. The dems are bad and don't care. It is pretty foolish to support them as a party. If you consider yourself a democrat, you probably are not a leftist. I'm registered democrat, I vote democrat, so do many of my friends, but that does not make us democrats or supporters of their party. So, yea, it's possible that you've held or supported people who've held foolish or bigoted beliefs and if you're proud of your support for them then I'm not sure you get to claim you're not foolish or bigoted.

Dem senators in the 90s voted against gay marriage. Nancy pelosi and plenty of other dems do insider trading and refuse to allow legislation that would curb that to pass. Are those the dems you support? Who's to know. These people are not your friends and don't care about you. They may vote in ways that benefit you, or they may not. I'm not a democrat and I don't support them because they don't support me or my comrades. If you feel like they support you than you are indeed either a fool, or not left enough to really even want to be called a leftist. That's fine if so, you can be a lib if that's what you are, but leftists generally don't "support" dems.

Not really sure what the sentiment is? That you should shame a small minority of people who you generally agree with whose decision did nothing to actually sway an election? You think that the Harris campaign was good and did what it should have to engage its base and draw in support? Do you believe that the non voting leftists were actually a large enough percentage to have an impact?

I scrolled a bit through your history and it took quite a bit to load far back (which is great, glad you're engaging cuz Lemmy needs more comments/community) but I'll take your word that you agree with them and said so previously. At least I can agree that harping on it does little actual good.

I had no idea. Thank you for that information. I 100% believe that, but can you link any relevant studies? I feel like I would be less likely to convict if I felt a juvie was being sent to an adult center. The only thing I could think would be that a state would be more likely to try as an adult in cases with overwhelming evidence or particularly abhorrent crimes, so they're more likely to get convicted because for the same reason they were more likely to be tried as an adult. Would love to see how that was accounted for or if it was all just mock trials. Again, not doubting the findings, just interested in the methodology.

That is absolutely not a fun fact.