You could freeze the entire universe, measure the state of every last particle, and you still wouldn't be presented with the answer to a moral question because morality is fundamentally something people made up, but don't collectively agree on. From a truly objective point of view, there is no actual difference between genocide and ending world hunger except the amount of people.
Sounds like the exact things he's there for: to play politics. I assume you're equally as vocal in opposition whenever politicians work towards goals you like?
Funny how when someone doesn't just rubber stamp everything that hits their desk it becomes a threat to democracy. Surely an elected representative not approving things is equally as democratic as approving them, no?
Funny how he completely ignores the issue of regulatory capture. Maybe there'd be some competition if you didn't have to already be insanely wealthy for the government to let you into the industry.
You could freeze the entire universe, measure the state of every last particle, and you still wouldn't be presented with the answer to a moral question because morality is fundamentally something people made up, but don't collectively agree on. From a truly objective point of view, there is no actual difference between genocide and ending world hunger except the amount of people.