Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MI
Posts
22
Comments
1,291
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • People keep saying his administration ignores the courts completely. But this is another case where they chose not to openly defy the courts. They push the line as much as they can, but they seem unwilling to blatantly cross it.

  • Others have speculated that she was just to honest with the boarder staff. And just told them what she was doing. Probably didn't even know it was against the terms of her visa. But remember, Elon says empathy is our greatest weakness. Doesn't seem to be much of that in ICE.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The fun thing is that authority over education is already in the hands of the states. And I bet that ED is already understaffed, so they probably can't ensure the things in the last line if they fire people. All that makes the order effectively already met.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Sadly... that is kinda true. Tons of jobs require a college degree that is completely unnecessary. It just a way for companies to support the schools their leadership went to. But of course, that has nothing to do with the department of education.

  • The interesting thing about this is the amount of spin the bbc is putting on it. They generally do far less of that than US media outlets. But calling her a tourist in the headline is a clear misrepresentation. And really, they didn't even need to go there. The real story was already bad enough. She could have been full on running a housekeeping business, and the chains still would be ridiculous cruelty worth reporting on. Even Canada said no way when she tried to enter as a "tourist". But I guess she should have asked for assylum rather than come back to the US at that point.

  • I'm 50/50 on this one. It's a cemetery website. Seems like it should mostly stick to who is buried there, and where. Ideally it would link out to some other government site with general information on the person. That could of course link to things like wikipedia or what not. Having notable graves makes it feel like a tourist attraction. And producing educational history material seems a bit outside their lane. Seems like there should be better sites with more experts to handle that.

  • By inconsistently choosing when they will moderate supporting murder and when they won't, they are essentially deciding what murder is okay. And that "should" disqualify them from section 230 protections. It doesn't because section 230 is too broad. But by picking which third party content to allow they are essentially editorializing using other people words.