Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
42
Comments
1,502
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Are you calling me the Loch Ness Monster? Gasp.

    Anyways, I would need about 3 dollars and 50 cents from you, please.

  • Generative AI can make each individual artist/writer/programmer much more efficient at their job, but the shareholders and executives get their way and only big companies have access to this technologu, this increased productivity will instead be used reduce headcount and make the remaining people do more work on a tighter deadline, instead of helping everyone work less, do better work, and be happier.

    This is the reason I think democratizing generative AI via local models is important, because as your example shows, it levels the playing field between small and big players, and helps people work less while making more cool stuff.

  • You sure look the part of a smart IT guy. I would trust you to help me with my tech problems.

    Go for it, good luck!

  • Breakthrough technological development usually can be described as a sigmoid function (s-shaped curve), while there is an exponential progress in the beginning, it usually hit a climax then slow down and plateau until the next breakthrough.

    There are certain problem that are not possible to resolve with the current level of technology for which development progress has slowed to a crawl, such as level 5 autonomous driving (by the way, better public transport is a way less complex solution.), and I think we are hitting the limit of what far transformer based generative AI can do since training has become more and more expensive for smaller and smaller gains, whereas hallucination seems to be an inherent problem that is ultimately unfixable with the current level of technology.

  • Top post in this thread is someone cheering that AI won’t replace people in hollywood.

    I really like how I'm just "someone" here now.

  • Oh surprise surprise, looks like generative AI isn't going to fulfill Silicon Valley and Hollywood studios' dream of replacing artist, writers, and programmers with computer to maximize value for the poor, poor shareholders. Oh no!

    As I said here before, generative AIs are not universal solution to everything that has ever existed like they are hyped up to be, but neither are they useless. At the end of the day, they are ultimately tools. Complex, powerful, useful tools, but tools nonetheless. A good artist can create better work faster with the help of a diffusion model, the same way LLM code generation can help a good programmer finish their project faster and better. (I think). All of these AI models are trained on data from data from everyone on Internet, which is why I think its reasonable that everyone should have access to these generative AI models for the benefit of humanity and not profit, and not just those who took other people's work for free to trained the models. In other words, these generative AI models should belong to everyone.

    And here lies my distaste for Sam Altman: OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit for the benefit of humanity, but at the first chance of money he immediately started venture capitalisting and put anything from GPT-2 onwards under locks and keys for money, and now it looks like that they are being crushed under the weight of their own operating costs while groups like Facebook and Stability catches up with actual open models, I will not be sad if "Open"AI fails.

    (For as much crap as I give Zuck for the other awful things they do, I do admire their commitment to open source.)

    I have to admit, playing with these generative models is pretty fun.

  • Unless you actually know Tom Hanks personally and are expecting a call from him, of course.

  • But I'm not a bot, I was here to promote a movie on this new social media platform...

    Wait a minute, that's exactly what an advertising bot would do!

    ... Oh boy.

  • Oh yes, that is definitely the actual plot of "the GOD-FATHER" and I, Margot Robbie, am very interested to hear more big, strong men explain the intricacies of this movie while we do nothing suspicious in the background at all!

    Maybe we can watch the Snyder Cut later too!

  • I wouldn't know, because I've never seen this "The god-FATHER". Can someone please explain the plot of this "the God-FATHER" to me?

    (A distraction? I don't know what you are talking about.)

  • I scrolled a bit more, and saw another AI-generated nude of someone who looked like Margot Robbie.

    Ever since I was a little girl, I've always wanted to become an anatomically deformed eldritch horror haunting the collective nightmare of humanity. And also, look pretty.

    Dreams do come true.

  • It always works the third time, 60 percent of the time.

  • But in practical use, people found out that even a 50/50 chance of plugging the connector in the right way is annoying enough to warrant the additional complexity of reversability, hence the development of USB Type C.

    The USB-C design turned out to be much more durable and versatile (signal and power wise) in addition to reversability compared to the previous USB designs, and it is developed specifically to address the problems people found with USB-A/B/MicroUSB.

    Sometimes problems only reveal themselves through real life usage, and iterative improvement through a scientific trial and error process to address these problem is how you get development progress.

  • The fact that they have it on this blatant of a propaganda poster means that unions work.

    And going through union for what you need is much more effective and quicker than letting a supervisor/manager drag their feet and kick the ball around, and that's what makes union dues worth it.

  • Pretending to be a goofy impersonation of himself would be hilarious and would help him stay under the radar, huh.

    Now, where have I heard that one before?