Ultimately, even if this was an true... It still doesn't justify a modicum of the response from the IDF.
The "shocking truth", putting aside is validity, is still no where near as shocking as the continual genocide.
I just don't understand how they don't see that. Not only is your narrative false, it still wouldn't matter if it wasn't. It still doesn't justify the reaction in the slightest
Honestly love tailwind. Once you get used to all the names/abbreviations and how they work with sizes and states etc. it's much easier to see what's happening when eyeballing code.
Makes reviewing and bug fixing easier too.
I get that early on it feels annoying. I recall disliking it the first time I learnt it, but then when I went back to regular css and classes I really missed it.
Really? Anecdotal evidence, in a scientific setting, is described as
casual observations/indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis
This study is about the general trends of people judging others with tattoos incorrectly. It doesn't mean everyone, always, judges people incorrectly.
It also states that context matters for how accurately you judge someone. The gun, money, and the public information of his terrible actions, all change how you assess them and how accurate your assessment is.
So in your case, yes, if you judged him as a rapist because he had a birthday tattoo, you were correct. But that is anecdotal evidence. And context based.
Unless you're implying everyone with a birthday tattoo is also a sexual assaulter/rapist, which is certainly a take, then it is anecdotal and doesn't go against the studys findings.
I recall saying something like "the function 'draw_card' doesn't mutate the deck variable" and it goes "I'm sorry, you're correct. I'll fix it to mutate the deck variable" and it returns the same code but changes the the card variable inside function to be called "mutate_the_deck".
A lot of people that voted for Trump probably wouldn't actually want what he actually brought to the table, but through decades of neo-lib propaganda and ignorance to non economical issues and general right wing media extreme bias thought it was "the right choice"
I was using phoenix and elixir right when Chat gpt came out and people were like "it'll take our jerb".
I tried to get it to build a basic module that built a playing deck of cards. At first it looked OK, the basic layout made sense, but then I realised it called functions that weren't there, some functions were just empty, since logic was wrong and actually it was all around terrible.
I tried to fix it with prompts and it got worse or implemented my suggestions incorrectly and was still broken.
Ultimately it took a lot longer to get no where than if I'd just written it by myself. But I could see how someone with not much knowledge in the area could see the output and be impressed.
I just have memories of the early days of genetic sequencing research breakthroughs and the Israeli government started to order it's scientists to sequence the Israeli and Palestinian DNA to "prove" their difference... only to very quickly learn they were almost identical, stop the program, and try and stop people from talking about it.
I just NEED all the liberals and centrists to remember shit like this anytime the right tries to get righteous about protecting children or claiming minority groups are grooming kids etc.
They literally don't give a shit about harm to kids, thir "team" are the worst perpetrators of it and they don't hold them accountable in the slightest.
Cause he's a thin skinned bitch.