Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)HE
Posts
0
Comments
358
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In Sweden the responsibility comes first, the company are liable for the employee if they don't take action and know about the substance abuse (for example). And I think the US at least had some laws prohibiting like that, but maybe I'm thinking of wrongful termination

  • This was more common back in the days, but the issue is that it will result in societal inefficiencies like alcoholics not getting better. Best is nipping it before it gets a lot worse.

    This is why in other countries there are a lot of responsibilities as an employer and they need to help with either private or public healthcare.

  • I've also worked a lot in heavy industry and if choices were. I'd rather have drug testing at an interval than not, and alcohol blow test every morning.

    Narcotics, and alcohol, do not belong in the workplace and I dispise apologists. Then I'm also biased against since I've seen too many ruin their lives catching the next high or dying of it. A bit irrelevant to your post but it really rustles my jimmies.