Hasuris @ Hasuris @sopuli.xyz

Posts

0

Comments

91

Joined

2 yr. ago

Or maybe they just disagree with the "common accepted minimum requirements" (please link your source) as they've done before.

Ah I see. Graphics didn't get any more complex and needed stronger hardware before raytracing was introduced. There isn't any way to make a game demanding and look pretty without raytracing.

If you think it's not acceptable, then... Don't accept it I guess?

Maybe the graphics are that intense, even at whatever they chose to call "medium". Try "low" then and see how those work out.

You are worked up about linguistics because it's nothing more to you at the moment. Just because you're used to run every other game at "high" or whatever, doesn't mean this different game has to be the same.

I refuse to agree with "my midrange GPU has to be able to run everything at Ultra for #random number# of years or I am going ballistics". I want progress. That's what I buy new hardware for every few years. If you want graphics to be stuck and don't advance in any meaningful way, get a console.

You still don't know what medium means. Until you do it's pretty pointless to get worked up about linguistics.

You'll be able to play a new game with state of the art graphics at medium settings with a mid range GPU from 3 years ago. Seems fine to me.

We don't know what medium settings actually mean. It may still look amazing.

For Control (2019) the first released minium system requirements had a Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 from 2016. This was later lowered but that's pretty much in line with what we see now. They're aiming for next gen graphics. It worked for Control. The game was used as a benchmark for raytracing for years.

Yes that's 28 days later. But they made them only act aggressively towards noninfected. So supercharged zombies in a way but they'd die after some time without food.

A walking dead version? Sure. 28 days later? Nah. If those fuckers run like that, we'd be done for.

Yes I realize 28 days later technically has no zombies but it's a more probable scenario to have a virus infect people and make them mad than actual corpses walking around.

Stöckchen

"when has the EU ever done anything for us"

But what do you do instead? Take a look at when some parts of the world would see their sunrise and sunset if all the world switched to winter time or summer time forever. What works at one place, results in a crazy daylight cycle in another.

Or make kids wear football gear and helmets. Maybe they can even combine it with body armor for the occasional school shooting.

/s

They could be handing those out for free and they'd still rot on the shelves. People just don't know what to do with them and I am not certain Amazon does.

Charge for them? That's meta verse idea quality.

This. If you don't need a laptop for anything in particular, get a desktop pc. Performance will be way better and you can easily upgrade it later on.

A good monitor beats whatever you can do with a laptop any day. No gaming laptop can come close to a nice 24" or bigger screen.

I use the original shield controller and it's great with no input lag. I never got the headphone jack on it working though.

"Offline Organic Maps Hike Bike"

Wait what happened to maps.me? I still have it installed but barely use it but fondly remember the days hiking with it or exploring new towns.

Totally unrelated but did you know there's a promotion deal for AMD's latest and greatest RX7000 GPUs?

You're funny, kinda. Sad funny. Maybe it's just hard for you to remember a few lines back or something.

I don't know why I am arguing with some random internet trollish child. I'll need to work on that and ignore more.

You mean like a game needs to offer more than dull enviroments to be not boring although the astronauts on the moon didn't seem to be bored on the dull moon?

And that's why CoD hasn't you going on patrol missions for hours and digging trenches or guard duty. A realistic war game would be boring as fuck.

You know CoD isn't realistic at all, right?