Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
5
Comments
202
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Many European language versions of anime and games are being localized not by translating the original Japanese, but the English.

    Lots of translators also seem to use Google or DeepL, which makes the issue even worse.

    The English language version often don't even translate, they write their own version, calling it "creative liberty". This leads to a completely different version than what was intended, with others, such as the German or Spanish version, being even further from the original.

    That's why claims of people of having "learnt Japanese from anime" are dubious in the best of cases.

    Source: Am Japanese, working in game translation in Tokyo. I'm also trilingual, which makes it even worse to watch this. Ignorance is bliss.

  • Imagine Mexico having a female president in a timeline where America elects Trump again. Then imagine the overwhelming amount of cringe coming out of the White House that'll make American people look like backward hillbillies, reinforcing all the already existing stereotypes.

    Jeez I need to stock up on popcorn for this.

  • Good thing I'm using Firefox.

  • What devs see is "all those other devs are too lazy to make a good game".

    What players mean is "all those other games are full of micro transactions and sell missing content and features as dlc", which is not the same thing.

    What players want to be addressed is the bad influence investors have on the products. Publishers aren't interested in publishing good games, they only care about money.

    Devs don't go about making a game only for the money. Most of them would rather do it the same way Larian does it, focus on quality and provide a good gaming experience, but their hands are tied.

    So the message gamers try to get out goes to the wrong recipients, and it's obviously being taken the wrong way.

    Pretty obvious and epic communication fail.

  • I make one attempt to explain myself, maybe add a clarification. If it still looks like it'd turn into an argument, I just let it go.

  • Trading with currency is the basis for capitalism. Capitalism is lending/investing. When you don't have any actual wares at hand, but currency, virtual value, you trade for higher future virtual value.

  • So much anger, your post is hard to read. What instances' admins are you talking about, and what happened?

    I've rarely seen an admin, only occasionally in sticky announcement type posts, talking about stuff like software updates and such.

  • Capitalism really is trading goods for currency, and allowing lending and investment. What's going on though, with unchecked companies and laughable fines, ruins the whole thing. In its current state, capitalism will be our undoing, but with proper laws, regulations and oversight, it could work.

    The problem is, corps have grown too powerful already and can blackmail governments. It's like other models that could work in theory, but never benefit the people in the end. Communism tends to lead to tyranny, for example.

    People are just really shit at designing and running big societies.

  • It's not regulated properly, that's the problem

  • It's always been bad, but some decades ago, newspapers and TV brought on actual experts for analyses, whereas these days, everyone can step on a soapbox -- as a result, you get people who have no clue what they're talking about spouting nonsense left and right.

    Of course you want people to do educate themselves on their own on matters they find important, but it developed into a direction where watching Fox and reading some tweets from your echo chamber gives you enough confirmation to make you feel like you did do proper research.

  • News need to be reduced to just news, without the presenters' opinions on it. It's this "processed information" dilemma, fuelled by greed and enabled by lacklustre regulations, that's enabling the chaos. Not just (but especially) in the USA.

  • I've seen cases of explosive diarrhea you wouldn't believe :D

  • Instead of reposting it here, you link to a corpo website.

    What kind of pirate are you? LOL

  • I just listen. To the wind, the insects outside etc, but this requires some practice.

  • I'm talking about internet content. Maybe this is where personal assistants can come into play at some point.

  • Users need more control over the kind of content they want to see. The problem Lemmy has is very similar to the main problem with the internet as a whole: the current model is that of a "regulator" who controls the flow of information for us.

    What I'd like to see is giving users the tools to filter for themselves, which means the internet as a whole. Not interested in sports, let me filter it all out by myself, instead of blocking individual parts piecemeal.

    The problem is that no company has an incentive to work on something like that, and I wouldn't even know where to start designing such interface tools on my own, but there is, for example, a keyword blocker for YouTube that prevents video that contain said terms from appearing on my timeline. I've used it to block everything "Trump", for example. I'd like to see more of that.