Hi-Rez is the king of creating a new game, pretending it's their "big thing" and then enshittifying it while their good devs are moved to the next "big thing." They are fad chasers who are constantly in a race to monetize a market and then move on.
I'm glad it caught up with them. Couldn't have happened to a better company. Apologies to the earnest designers and programmers that got caught in the crossfire.
Confused about why he'd have to resign over that. I would have suspect that it's a workplace that welcomes those perspectives. Elon is a "free speech absolutist" after all.
Because as long as they get clicks, they don't care, and anything with "Gaza" or "Palestine" in it will generate those clicks. Plus, running such stories is substantially less likely to result in someone lighting a fire underneath them then the other stuff they should be covering.
You quoted a bunch of stuff from the study like there's a problem with it. If you're going to attempt to dismiss the study as bullshit, you should probably try finding evidence of bullshit, rather than pointing and screaming, like we all understand whatever incredibly biased point it is you think you have.
Does this mean the algorithm was designed to push a republican agenda? Or does the algorithm know that liberals are more likely to watch videos from the opposing side than conservatives?
Both of these things can be true.
A friend of mine likes to say, a systems goal is what it does in practice, not its design intent.
Marginalized groups can be more or less marginalized than others. That does not make them powerful relative to the rich-ass white men that run the world through financial influence alone.
Ya'll motherfuckers act like just cause women can vote now, sexism is "solved."
I've also heard some "running it offline avoids all the Chinese biasing and spying" anecdotes. Though I haven't seen any first hand evidence of this. Needs testing, imo.
All allegations that the 2024 election was rigged are speculative, and there are no investigations examining the claims. The claims have not contested the election results as a whole.
Okay? Then fuck off with your clickbait fearmongering bullshit? Either there is evidence of ratfuckery, and investigations should already be underway, or there's not and they don't need to be.
Trump is literally building camps for out groups and disassembling the entire trade system that the US and its closest allies have depended on. We don't have time for this speculative "maybe" garbage. Get out there and do something, or stop wasting my time with speculation in the hopes that punchy headlines and ad engagement will save you for Der Fuhrer's concentration camps and total economic collapse.
Your best bet is to be in a lot of instances. My experiences so far is that basically any singular instance has its bias', and while some unapologetically ban users for disagreeing with them, the ones that don't still down vote for disagreeing with them.
While one of these forms of censorship is worse than the other, it's all censorship, and the only way to see a variety of views is to stay in the varying instances.
Let's be real: it's about control. They want sex on their terms, and paying for it doesn't put them in control. They say things like "genuine human connection," while desperately wanting a traditional, subservient woman that they can use to satisfy their needs.
I'm with him. Deleting the entire Department of Government Efficiency would solve a lot of problems.