Deportation infers that they didn't belong there to begin with. You can't deport a naturally born citizen, and we have another word for which is considered much more cruel: exile.
Might be a language barrier thing but the difference is pretty substantial imo, and I am tired of letting these chuds rework the narrative with their particular choice of words.
Okay, like, I get the meme, but seeing someone kill a large mouse with a baseball bat remains disturbing. There's a reason we set traps for these things, you know?
Underclocking your CPU like crazy because you don't want to replace the thermal paste is an insane thing to do, and probably still won't help, as the thermal paste being gone means there's nowhere for the heat to go. It'll just build and build until you hit a spike; you'll just reach that spike slower. You're rapidly sacrificing your parts by not just opening it up, cleaning out the dust and replacing the thermal paste, even using some kind of heat-reduction work around.
85 degrees is high but normal for a component that is pushing it, so software solutions, like underclocking, are viable. 100 degrees is "most computers will turn off to protect the components" territory, suggesting something has gone wrong with your cooling solutions and it really needs to be opened up.
But, that's not the question you asked, just a word of warning I felt compelled to add. Depending on the processor and motherboard, there are BIOS solutions and in-OS solutions. Check your mobo for settings in advanced. If they're there, they're there. If you're using an old Ryzen, (I believe the 1000 series is 8 years old now?) there's an app called AMD Ryzen Master that lets you tweak CPU speeds and voltages. Realistically Google "[CPU name] underclock" and you'll find a guide that links you to software, if it is available for your processor. I've never heard of a catch-all third party software solution for CPU clocking, the way Afterburner does that for GPU.
What? You mean it was... Projection? Unbelievable. Republicans never do that.
It's like watching a cheater jump to conclusions about others cheating. It's easy for them to imagine it's happening, because it's what they'd be doing in that situation.
I'm famously a World hater, so yes, absolutely. Until Icebourne released, I was extremely disappointed with World, even for a pre-G Rank release.
Though, all of the titles since Generations have had the problem of being released with a portion of the planned content missing. I was more forgiving of it before, though I am having a hard time pinpointing why.
Ah yes, an executive director of a church writing an opinion piece on why we need more fossil fuels burning the earth faster and filled with hyperbole on the way we've thrown open Canada's doors to all the immigrants who are stealing our houses and health care. Such quality.
Believing police in the USA are anything near well trained or disciplined is naive at best.
Correct, which is why it's not an opinion I expressed.
My statement was that giving untrained, undisciplined people weapons is a bad thing. The point was to address the whataboutism of "they're out there shooting us right now," not to defend the absolute joke that is police in the United States.
Now that I've discovered the rest of the article beyond the wall of ads, I agree. I had partial information, and wrongly believed it was all the information, as the blob of ads on my mobile device was a whole screen. That, combined with being on the way out the door in the morning, led me to believe I had read everything and everyone in this thread is insane. Thenn, someone made a specific reference to something I hadn't read and I was prompted to go look, discovering there is much more article beyond our corporate sponsored break.
I legit thought they scared a dude with a rifle into fleeing, and then shot at him instead of letting him get away.
The dude with the rifle was running. That whole argument is fine when someone is draw weapons and making threats, but they shot at someone trying to flee the scene after causing no harm and killed an innocent. Everything else is imaginary justification.
EDIT: Wondering where the hell everyone else got so much more information, I reloaded the article, scrolled past the ad wall and found the rest of the text, which makes clear that the dude with the rifle pulled his gun into a firing position on the crowd. Fair enough, I was wrong and the citizen was right to have taken the shot. I blame the ad wall for convincing me that the news article was over.
He is proposing exile. Deportation is to send someone back to their country of origin. They're already in America.