Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)GE
Posts
0
Comments
408
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Why? Why can an AI not replace a CEO? And why has CEO compensation risen, while average worker compensation dropped, all while worker output has increased over the past decades? That seems like simple math, that the money isn't going to who it should be going to and is just going to management and investors because they make the rules

  • I do know something about your experience in life, you communicated that clearly, and continue to communicate that in all your replies.

    You're free to comment your opinion, and I welcome you to comment on what you think my history/experience in life is like. But I will never stop defending women or really any other groups that are constantly harassed, demeaned, misrepresented, etc.

    I do so hoping that you'll be open to learning something new, but if not then at the very least you'll know this is not a safe space for sexism, others have the chance to gain a new perspective or add to the discussion, and people in those groups know they are welcome here and valued as people.

  • whereas barbie girls are usually just for show.

    Women are not objects or "just for show". They are people.

    In either case, both the barbie girl and the big tiddy goth gf are (generally) of no use in the household.

    Women are not household slaves to clean up after you. They are not objects. Their worth is not dependent on how they cook or clean. Maybe you can be learn to be useful in the household.

    One is for show, the other one is for sexual pleasure, but neither of them can be classified as good partners (in general... doesn't mean it's true for all).

    Again, not objects. Not sex objects, not trophies for your viewing pleasure, not cleaning robots. And saying "doesn't mean it's true for all" doesn't make your sweeping generalization not demeaning or objectification. Anyone can be a good partner. If you keep having bad experiences with large groups of women, guess what... you're the common denominator.

    They usually care more about their style (appearance) than anything else.

    Another generalization -_- the same people that say this kinda thing then unironically spend 12 hours playing video games or throw a tantrum when their sports team loses. It's a hobby for some people. And for others, they're told they're not worth anything unless they spend all their time looking perfect (like you just did in the last paragraph)

    but... when it comes to actually marrying one, usually, none of them is them is the right choice.

    I will never understand how some people will say women are sex objects and then shame them when they have sex, all in the same breath. And if you're kinky or like sex, you're bad at marriage? That doesn't even make any logical sense.

    You want a partner that will be by your side and cherish what you both have? Go to a market or a convenient store at 9AM on a Sunday. Those are the people that know what responsibilities are and will always be there for you.

    Yeah, best place to hit on women is when they're grocery shopping lmao I don't know why, but this reminds me of parents telling their kids to put on a suit, walk into any company, shake the owner's hand, and you'll get a job.

    Once again, this is a generalization... doesn't mean everything is like I described it... this is more of a past experiences sort of a thing, mainly my experiences.

    Yeah, it's not like you describe. You have to work through that resentment you feel towards these women before you have a healthy relationship. Seriously, as a man who could have very easily become an incel, I'm telling you that the most important thing you can do is to think of women as people. Retrain your brain, reinforce the thought 'this woman is just like me, they are doing what they are doing for a reason. If I disagree with what they are doing, maybe I don't understand it. I'll try to understand it before criticizing it. And what this one woman is doing does not represent all women'

    I was lucky enough to meet a woman who is a lot like the women you're criticizing. And she is an incredible wife and partner, and I have learned so much from her about what it means to be a woman. I hope one day you can find the same empathy and understanding.

  • I care. Pretending intent doesn't matter just allows the hatred this mod creator has to grow. They didn't make that change in good faith, it's a common dog whistle for right wing bigots. Around 1% regret transition, and often because of backlash from those around them, not because they're not trans.

    When someone's intent is to criticize and invalidate a trans person's very existence, I care. And obviously plenty of people do since the mod was removed.

  • I'm unsure of the point you're trying to make?

    It's relevant in this case because the age they are today is underage. A picture of them 10 years ago is underage. And a picture of anyone made by AI to deep fake them nude is unethical irregardless of age. But it's especially concerning when the goal is to depict underage girls as nude. The age thing specifically could get a little complicated in certain situations ig, but the intent is obvious most of the time.

  • I can appreciate what you're doing but I do think there's an issue in this case.

    From your second link regarding the word "idiot", the term this community is using,

    It is here that we start to see the problematic connotations of the word; it became synonymous with “ignorant person.” This meaning passed with the term throughout history, resulting in our use of it today to mean someone we perceive as being ignorant or stupid.

    Looking into it further, for the majority of the time it's been a word, "idiot" has meant an ignorant person. Which is absolutely not the same as having any certain mental condition. Calling someone ignorant isn't inherently ableist. It wasn't until (imo) one of the worst time periods of psychology (late 1800s, early 1900s) that it was appropriated to be used as a medical diagnosis along with "moron" to describe someone with a low IQ or "mental age". Now that we've mostly moved past those ignorant concepts, we've changed diagnostic terms and started using those old words to mean something akin to their original definition.

    Where we likely agree and what people replying to you may be missing is that ignorance is being used as an insult, which is not helpful. And while the community name may be accurate (a community to discuss ignorance on Facebook) it is toxic and low hanging fruit to post an image online for everyone to point and laugh at another person's ignorance. Especially as the poster may assume it's ignorance when it may actually be a manifestation of a certain mental condition.

    So the community will likely be unintentionally ableist but will almost certainly be toxic and an easy way for people to feel superior to others. So I personally will not judge their use of "idiot" but I will judge those who find this content amusing and entertaining. p.s. thank you to anyone who was silly enough to read my entire comment haha

  • Israel said that? I believe it 100% then, they've never lied especially on their social media. Oh hey, is that that same official Israel account that posted the fake hamas.com website as if it was real? The one that was cartoonishly evil with Hamas Testimonials, all written in English, and hosted on an Israeli server?

    There are plenty of examples of misinformation shared by both Palestinian supporters and the Israeli government so I'll believe this if it can be verified by a third party

  • My god please put a spoiler tag on that word, I'm in the hospital recovering from the worst heart attack the doctors have ever seen! Scared the heebie jeebies right out of me.

    Now excuse me while I look over my $200k hospital bill, might have to sell some organs for this one.