Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DR
Posts
0
Comments
280
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Your story reminds me, that in our driving exam, not the actual driving one, but the theory one, I got a single question wrong, and I was not allowed to know which one. If you got more than 3, you'd be told and be allowed to double check if you were scored wrong. But if you pass, you get told that and are expected to move on.

    I asked how the hell that was supposed to help someone learn or be prepared to drive without endangering others, and they just told me I passed, what do I care.

    And honestly, I truly didn't care, actually, and let it go. I mean, most people in the street drive like shit anyways, and the whole process of getting a license isn't really "academic". It's possible they were being cunts for no reason, it's also possible they do this on purpose to cheat the scores and just pass people who failed too many times, but it wasn't a fight worth having to find out.

  • I'm sure the Republicans would just come out of the woodwork and ask "Oh, but what about Obama, how come he can run for POTUS then?". Which is, of course, something I already seen someone ask. Wasn't even some old person from "different times" or whatever, this person genuinely just had no justifiable reason to be this racist.

  • Eh, with Elon, I prefer to assume stupidity over malice, because he also had already done shit to hurt his own image before he owned Twitter. Who was he being malignant against then? Himself? To own, uh, his supported??? Everything falls in place by just doing the single logical step of "he dumdum".

  • It's a bad idea to assume everyone in the field is of a similar mindset and philosophy. There are a LOT of people who genuinely want to make the world worse and see things like adblocking as piracy.

    In fact, I've met people who hate the concept of Open Source and want things to be closer to creative fields. They're shortsighted of course, greedy. But the basis doesn't change the outcome. Yes, it's blatantly their desires to "own" a piece of code the same way musicians often own a movie's score and get licensing fees on them that led that path. But they still walked it and they still exist and they're still out there, hoping for the day they get to go against you.

  • Yup. The vast majority of internet users NEVER:

    • Customizes their web experience
    • Uses apps almost exclusively
    • Navigates beyond the first page/screen

    How will they react to this?

    "Shut the hell up, fucking nerd and your fucking idiotic, stupid ass 'privacy' bullshit. God WHO THE FUCK CARES!? I was literally - LITERALLY - never inconvenienced by any of that stuff, so SHUT UP!"

    That's how.

    We're doomed. We were always doomed.

  • Yeah, I can imagine a fork of chromium existing that takes all the data and does the rendering pipeline """normally""", but then on the side does something completely different and shows THAT to the user, while giving the server an idea that nothing is wrong and what it is doing is just normal chromium stuff.

    But such an idea will be done entirely by enthusiasts, slowly, on an obscure basis. For the majority of users, that will never even be a conceivable notion of something they can do with the internet. Itll never be something you see on a top, mainstream browser.

    In other words, Google wins.

  • Shit man, this would ruin even the small internet. I won't even be able to cheat on dragcave. And most of what I was doing was keeping a tally of my collection since the site doesn't do that. But there's no way page modifications wouldn't be caught and punished no matter what they actually do.

  • So basically, anyone consuming the internet in any shape or form other than the intended by corporate owners is automatically dead in the water.

    Man, I can't go back to ad-full, sponsor-skipless youtube... It's too awful.

  • No, lol.

    It stands for animated png btw. It was an extension. The benefit was that it always rendered something everywhere, if it didn't support the animation, because it would be read out as a regular (but suspiciously heavy) png in that case.

    I brought it up because it's yet another old-ass .gif solution that didn't stick because people love the term "gif".

  • Honestly, even with the idea of daily content in mind, I would prefer that we just didn't end up making a bunch of "anyone else stopped playing games cuz job and old?" or "it's okay to quit games. Here's a bunch of totally relatable reasons why tou shouldn't have a backlog" threads and calling it content. They're unoriginal, samey, and sometimes I feel, botted.

  • You only dislike it because whatever bad app you're using to share them on doesn't support them.

    Stop being the gullible fool and start hating the apps not the file format.

    Edit: I also spot your .gif favouritism in there. .gif is an archaic and wasteful format, and asking for it is the same as looking at your car and whining that the fuel has no lead.

  • For comparison, Mastodon got 2.5 Million users and then promptly lost all of them. Since then it has been slowly gaining back and last numbers had them at 1.7 Million already.

    This X move by Musk might push them back to 2 million and beyond. The platform has matured.

    Lemmy needs a lot of work still, but give it time.

  • On youtube, the time of day you post something is far less important than several other factors. It doesn't really look at a video's age for the scoring and often brings back 6 year old videos. By far the most important is consistency, as YouTube's recommender largely works on a basis of like-You preferences, and if people like-You are seeing something, it tries to give that to others like-You. If they are driven away early on, YouTube just decides to not recommend at all.

    An example: Here's oddheader making a consistency mistake.

    https://youtube.com/@oddheader

    4 days ago he made a video ranking every single Barbie game. That is not an unpopular category of video. But he still gets punished as that video is over an hour long while his usual is 15 minutes long, that video is very focused on a topic while his typical video is just a thematic excuse to talk about random shit, he usually present alone but here he has a guest, and his title to the video breaks format. Which means his subscribers didn't click it, which meant the recommender didn't think it had any virality, which meant it never went forward.

    So instantly got punished with a 80% penalty on engagement.