Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DO
Posts
0
Comments
925
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Lots of techniques to try and demonize Israel being used here. Of course no sources provided and they're all basically opinions started from a negative bias against Israel and enforced with every little tidbit of info they can get.

  • I doesn't operate in Europe, so they don't care to be GDPR compliant. They do operate in California, so they need to support those laws. It's still not worth it to look at changing their policy towards GDPR even if they're complaint.

  • You do realize your entire first point is invalidated by the comment you're replying to? I just said the customer has to press a button on their phone to initiate the update. On that same phone they can view release notes that clearly outline the recall. Additional on first use, the car will display those same release notes on the screen.

    Sure, safety vs convenience is a huge factor in software development. The biggest factor to safety is unpatched software. You know, the kind that requires significant effort to update, such as needing to bring your car into the shop to apply.

    Overall your doom and gloom argument against OTA safety updates is pretty weak.

  • Right, because the recall for the icons on the screen needing to be a tad bigger is as serious as uncontrolled acceleration of a giant hunk of metal.

    They need a new name for software update recalls and physical recalls. They both need to be serious, but a distinction is needed.

  • Recalls still require the customer to take action. They're much less likely to go into the shop to have it fixed than press a button on their phone and have the car fix itself overnight.

    Your suggestion for not allowing safety software fixes OTA is dangerous.

  • Oh geez, starting a new discussion because you were called out on your bullshit? I'm talking about surrounding countries, not the people those countries abandoned in their pursuit to destroy Israel. If you want to shift the discussion to a new topic, how about starting your own thread of discussion instead of trying to call bullshit on someone else's discussion?

  • Any information that doesn't follow your narrative is misinformation huh? That's the tactic you're going with to hide your own misinformation?

    Those wars happened, those countries wanted to wipe Israel off the map. The US negotiated with them and gave most of them money to stop trying to destroy Israel. How about actually knowing history Instead of trying to come up with your own?

  • Do you have a credible source on that? Because propagandists keep claiming that without backing it up with actual evidence that they're not just making up whatever fits their narrative

    Turns out Wikipedia has a great article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calls_for_the_destruction_of_Israel#:~:text=Ali%20Khamenei%2C%20Iran's%20supreme%20leader,of%20Israel%20from%20the%20region%E2%80%9D.

    I recommend checking the sources to verify it yourself.

    None of them anywhere near successfully and none of them in this millennium.

    Of course they were not successful, otherwise they would have wiped Israel off the map like their intended goal was. Also, your claim of not in this millennium is disingenuous. There are still plenty people alive to thought in those wars on both sides.

    And you can't just greatly exaggerate decades old events and pretend that they represent an imminent and existential threat.

    I> mean, you obviously CAN, since you just did, but you really shouldn't.

    I didn't, that was you doing that. I was simply adding context to the person I was replying to.