DoomBot5 @ DoomBot5 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

925

Joined

2 yr. ago

Looking at the content posted, that's clearly a no.

Sure, put words in my mouth. You've yet to answer why you're justifying rockets fired at Israeli civilians just because they're mostly being stopped, while condemning rockets fired at Hamas.

How many people have been killed by those rockets vs. how many children killed by the IDF?

I'll remind you that Hamas recruits children. Is an unfortunate situation where the children and terrorists counts have some overlap.

Also, why is it always about kill counts? Are you saying it would be more okay with if Hamas successfully killed more people?

Repairing Gaza by removing the terrorists hiding there.

Terrorist group Hamas is shooting rockets from there, so of course Israel isn't going to ignore it completely. If Hamas stopped hiding behind civilians, the entire area would have been left alone.

Israel literally told Gazans to go to Rafah to be safe. They said it was a safe zone.

And the IDF was operating elsewhere, not entering Rafah at the time.

Now they're supposed to leave Rafah.

Yes, that's how it works. It's like how sometimes during road construction, the construction crew might route you into a different traffic lane. Doesn't mean that lane will remain safe to drive on forever.

You might ask where Israel thinks Gazans are supposed to go. The answer is- nowhere. They're supposed to die.

Now this is just plain false, since it doesn't look like you actually bothered reading any details about it. Israel did in fact tell them where to go.

You realize the name Palestine is what the Romans renamed the land to add insult to injury after kicking out all the Jews.

The zionist game? That's been the main playbook of all the Hamas supporters. "What do you mean we fired thousands of rockets aim at civilians before the IDF came in here? They're just trying to oppress our rights to self expression"

Your example has occurred in dozens of companies, but people just don't care.

The news outlets I saw reporting on this were mostly calling out that violence was started by agitators rather than counter-protestors

Nah, you have it backwards. The protestors broke into a building, so police was sent to get them out. It would be the same outcome as if you decided to break into a building and lock yourself in.

You got a source on that?

Bad timing on your end. The Colombia protestors just raided one of the halls and barricaded themselves in.

Tents on a lawn is one thing, even if they did nothing to silence the calls for hate among their ranks. Breaking (in the literal sense) into a building and causing damage is a whole level of escalation from the protestors. At what point do they shift into a violent riot?

W safety of some students cannot be comprised by granting other students their freedom.

Wrong, try again.

I'm talking about the deadline today. The university already started handing out suspensions for those still there, but haven't cleared them out yet.

When the cops show up at your home are they your own funded private security? The university called them in due to trespassing protestors.

Go read up about what the first amendment actually is and how it applies to private entities (hint: it doesn't).

Their camp is still there on campus past the deadline. They clearly haven't fully faced the consequences of it yet.

Nah, I expect people are dumb enough to think the first amendment protects them from private institutions and consequences. I've seen enough people over the years that have proven me right and were then surprised by the consequences of their own actions.