Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)CY
Posts
7
Comments
983
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Just to clear this up because of the obvious US defaultism, Im not from the USA.

    None of what you have said changes the fact that if genuine refugee intake was increased and replaced economic migrants there would be a net benefit to humanity in reducing human suffering.

  • The US has failing infrastructure, stagnant wages, high inflation, high crime rates and an over burdened and extortionately expensive healthcare system.

    What about those factors speaks to more capacity? If you replaced every economic migrant with a genuine refugee there would be far more humanitarian benefit overall.

  • A counterpoint is that allowing undocumented economic migrants in (which makes up the majority of illegal immigration) then there is reduced capacity for a country to take in and integrate refugees who are actually at risk of death or persecution.

    It is disingenuous to talk about illegal immigration as if all of them are at risk of death in their country of origin, and those that are genuinely at risk are refugees and able to apply for asylum once they reach a country.

  • Are these best shearers not still commoditizing the products of the body of another thinking being?

    What does that have to do with the question of whether or not the process of shearing is violent?

    How do we know your claims of non-violent sheering are true?

    How do you know PETAs claims are true? ("As reported by PETA, one eyewitness to the process said")

    I've been an eyewitness to the process, and I'm not idealogically biased the way PETA extremists are known to be.

    Where is the sheep in this shed, now?

    What? This sentence just doesn't make sense. The sheep don't live in the shed.

    The females of the breeds I have observed don't have horns, and their tails are docked to prevent excrutiatingly painful death by flystrike.

    The alternative to wool production in Australia is cotton, which is even more environmentally destructive than sheep are, mostly due to the sheer amount of water required for cotton production. People need clothes so these industries aren't going away.

    Shearers have an interest in not causing unecessary harm to sheep, because it is counter productive. That's my experience.

    The rest of your argument is moralising which I am uninterested in.