'We will not hesitate': Canada prepares to hit U.S. with billions in tariffs
To be clear, I'm not arguing that people don't put 88 as a clear dog whistle to white supremacists/general Nazi bullshit. This is more to the comment "who puts their birth year in their username?" bit specifically. The answer is a lot of people.
I also am not excusing Yen for his pro-Trump comments - that was fucking bullshit and I'm deeply disappointed - I'm just saying the YOB thing is a thing, but also coincidentally I also can't seem to find a source to prove if he's also doing the YOB thing or something else.
Note to self: Limit Lemmy to 3 beers max, particularly where Trumpian bullshit is involved. And thank god for autocorrect. Apologies, I really should not be interneting right now.
Look, I can't comment on the significance of binary 88 in this instance with any confidence, but a lot of people use their birth year in their username.
Is it stupid? Absolutely, alongside demonstrating a total lack of any creativity whatsoever. But it's 100% a thing.
Edit: Lol, will also note the first 'people also search' suggestion coming up when Googling Andy Yen is "When was Andy Yen born", and in the 5 seconds of drunken searching I still haven't seen a birth date.
Purely for the purpose of fairness/general interest, here's what I've found from Dessaline in this thread re: debunking on various topics. What you make of them and their merit is up to you, I'm just here cruising this thread for jokes myself.
Will say I think they'd be better served with adding the links when saying this, or under deleted comments saying "topic was x, debunked here [link]", but that's just me. I also cannot say for certainty I've captured every relevant post, particularly re: the content of removed comments [going into the mod log is an extra step I'm not doing rn, but you could if you wanted and try cross-referencing]
https://lemmy.ml/comment/16149912
https://lemmy.ml/comment/16149886
https://lemmy.ml/comment/16136497
https://lemmy.ml/comment/16135781
Edit: Removed one link, as it's a different instance of the same message. Again, think I'm missing stuff but I'm about go offline, so out of time.
Yes.
I own my part in this, though I know if I added the amp, cables, maybe a pedal, and some guitar picks, I would have ended up with a nice collection of guitar picks.
Because my wife and kid are assholes who think they are hilarious, which I have encouraged because I am too.
Same. Very, very heavily hinted at a used bass guitar for Christmas this year. Put a harmonica on the list as a joke as I was being nagged to put more stuff on the list.
Now I own a harmonica.
Context matters a lot:
-Discussing a general topic at length among peers, and someone says "Dude, no one cares"? They're telling you to stop taking, and a) are annoyed, or b) in a mood to put you down. Use the rest of the context to determine your next move (e.g. stop discussing it, point out why it's important, or leave).
-Discussing an insecurity of yours, and someone says "Dude, no one cares". Usually means they think the basis for your feeling insecure is unwarranted, usually though not always followed by a more direct statement on said insecurity. Meant to be reassuring, as someone else said.
-In some cases, "no one cares" means that in the speaker's experience, the amount of people who do care about thing x is marginal, to the point that paying too much attention to that warps the understanding of the situation. This is tricky - by way of example, I've said "no one cares if people are trans or not" before (I've learned - this is a deliberate example, stay with me). Taken at face value, this is blatantly untrue - some people care a lot, both in a negative and positive sense. But as just a guy in the world, this is truly my experience - other people being trans generally isn't something the majority of people care about. I can think of only one person I've met who does care (negative sense), and he's generally a weird guy anyway.
As you can imagine, though, going around saying this carries some danger, as it can gloss over the risks posed to trans people by those ostensibly marginal figures. My saying no one cares is a product of my necessarily limited exposure to and experience of the world. The best way to approach this IMO is considering, and speaking respectfully to, the speaker's blindspots - whether or not the people who care are truly marginal demographically, the impact the people at the margins actually have in the topic of discussion, etc. Depending on the exact topic, either it will be demonstrated that it is essentially true - while it's doubtless someone cares, the number of people and impact they have on the topic is marginal to the point that this is irrelevant to the topic at hand - or identify a blindspot that hampers the speaker's understanding of the situation.
I will note that in speaking of context, you may not be neurotypical (took a couple tests at some insistance by my kid, and despite being an odd duck in general, odds are I am) - unfortunately I can't speak to how to elicit and identify full context in that case, but others here might. Apologies if that's the case, where "use the rest of the context" probably sounds like "draw the rest of the fucking owl" in an owl drawing tutorial.
I'm not certain I buy that in every single case, but do buy into it for many, many cases.
It's actually something I tried to pass on to other folks when I worked a phone customer service job - there's cases where it's obvious the anger is coming from somewhere else if you're paying attention (example I had and shared was clearly fear), so told people to pay attention to exactly what folks are saying to try and elicit that, and speak/address the actual problem/emotion.
Fuck I miss that job some days...feels like the only thing I've done that I was really, really good at. Was also a small team with very little corpo oversight at the time, so don't know if these approaches would fly as well today v. scripted responses.
Pink Flamingos is currently preserved by the U.S. National Film Registry, selected in 2021. If selection was happening even a couple years from now, I have a hard time imagining that happening.
There's some countries OP's model could work in. But at least a dual model that includes citizen preservation efforts is warranted (and with it the relevant legislation to avoid it being a criminal act - though pirates gonna pirate, and I love 'em for it).
This is the way. Shoutout to The Tyee as well.
I'm split on this being the way - I would much prefer we keep the CBC, and I think an outlet with journalistic independence, national reach and recognition is an important thing for Canada. But there's a million things attacking it, so directly funding alternative outlets doing good work is OK in my book.
Will note people need to be conscious of any present bias and editorial slant in these smaller outlets - Canadaland has a particular type of Torontonian snark that has rubbed some Canadians the wrong way* for a long time in other contexts - but frankly this is necessary for larger outlets too anyway.
*I could just be salty that Jesse came for my boy Stuart McLean once. Putting aside my "How dare you!" initial reaction some interesting points were made in the criticism.
I had to clean the women's bathroom at a Burger King. This will pretty quickly correct any misconceptions you have about differences between the sexes re: bathroom etiquette, we're all god damn animals.
Wait, you're American?! Get outta here, you non-hoser! blocked
Kidding, of course - you're one of my favourites too. Think you could've chosen your words more carefully in the OP exchange - jealousy is a bit of a trigger word, it's more that the U.S.' reputation internationally is ... sketchy, even before the last periods of particular sketchiness. But some people just expand this to all individual Americans, which isn't fair - most Americans I've met are just normal people just as bewildered as the rest of us are at the state of the world (and the U.S' place in it).
Edit - story to illustrate my point. There's a psych band from the U.S. that did a show here not too long ago. Started off by saying "We're [band name I've forgotten] from the U.S.A.". There was silence, then a few low-key, almost confused sounding 'woo's. The lead then said "Woo? Hell, I wouldn't woo at that right now."
Feel this sentiment isn't that uncommon.
To this day, I haven't the foggiest what the fuck he and Guattari were trying to say, but think the concept of the rhizome can be useful insofar as I think I understand it.
sigh Gonna have to try again. Started reading Benjamin's Arcades Project recently in a similar fit of "shit you referenced in grad school and successfully bullshitted your way through because no one else actually understands it either" guilt, may as well do it for the big D too.
My experience re: this phenomenon was "I stared at A Thousand Plateaus for a while, then all of a sudden every fucking thing I read afterwards mentioned this guy."
There's a lot of stuff written on this topic, but I haven't seen this mentioned yet: there are conservative instances on Lemmy, as a platform. Most of them are widely defederated, not necessarily for the views of the majority (though in some cases, yes), but because of asshats deliberately causing trouble.
Unfortunately, this is also a product of a wider shift in discourse by the right (understood in a North American context), which appeals mostly to edgelords rather than the (rapidly shrinking, already shrunk to the point of irrelevance/non-existence one could argue) thinking, at least ostensibly humanistic conservative.
There's self-selection in action here. Which makes sense, even if I also find it troubling (there are people who can be reasoned with drowned out by Nazi assholes, who are willing to hear people out on the not-Nazi stuff, give positive reinforcement and with it a home to get radicalized).
I don't have a good answer, and if I did I'd probably be up for a Nobel Prize given how wide and damaging the problem is. It ain't just here - it's pretty much anywhere anyone expresses any idea. I just happen to like this side of the Threadiverse much more, so it's where I hang out.
Only real hope is meatspace, imo. And even then, not everyone has the privilege to engage this way in meatspace without a direct risk to their personal safety (see POC, our trans brothers and sisters, LGTBQ+ folks, etc.).
Gilles Deleuze, once I learned about him for some reason. It was an odd experience.
It's a fun phenomenon, especially if discussing with New Age types who will start dropping numerology interpretations.
If you can rein in an immediate "this is stupid bullshit and so are you" reflex, it's interesting from an for-entertainment-purposes-only perspective.
Every so often I see a video of someone trying to mess with a moose, and I can only assume it's because they are suicidal. Unless you have a gun and decent distance, a moose will fuck your shit up.
Re: statues, we have this beautiful bastard in Cow Bay, NS!
‘It’s Total Chaos Internally at Meta Right Now’: Employees Protest Zuckerberg’s Anti LGBTQ Changes
I caught it, but tensions are high in this thread (I get why), an /s would help a lot.
Last I checked, all of them except Iceland. However, your point stands - the U.S. accounts for well over half of total NATO defence expenditure.