Artisian @ Artisian @lemmy.world

Posts

8

Comments

82

Joined

2 yr. ago

Just put a relatively tech unaware friend on mint. They're doing very well so far!

I thought many of these were in the "Shadow docket" (or emergency docket), which is not new and is usually not given justifications/opinions. I understand these are traditionally cases where the legal question just isn't interesting (or expedient to flesh out). The court doesn't hide this practice, you can read about it here: Related news service

This isn't to say the court is acting normally. But I want to complicate this observation; one should compare with other presidents and issues.

My data plan on my phone expired rather suddenly (my phone was too old), and I just didn't get a new phone number/data plan (wifi + wifi calling still worked).

It was nice having unplugged transit time.

I do those too! That's where the ideas for new architectures, datasets, and training tweaks come from! Math is fun, and it's fascinating that math can talk sometimes.

Edit: And I see now that we're editing messages after people reply? Rude, no? Designing a hallucinating machine certainly doesn't rot your brain.

I think in a non market economy I would still work on language models. It's cool that a machine can hold a conversation.

This is from 2020; It seems like we might have more recent data and there's been some shifts?

This is the 2025 report from the same group: https://www.nationalsurveyreligiousleaders.org/s/NSRL-report-2025-clergy-in-america.pdf

They say (page 28):

Evangelical clergy, by contrast, stand out as especially conversionist, with 82% agreeing that it is important to try to persuade people to join them. Only 35% of mainline clergy agreed that such conversion attempts are important, compared to 41% of Black ministers and 52% of Catholic priests saying that. Consistent with their more ecumenical views, mainline clergy are less likely than clergy in any other group to agree that it is important for them to try to persuade people in other religions to accept their religion instead of the person’s current one, though the differences between the mainline percentage and the Catholic and Black Protestant percentages are not statistically significant at the conventional level.

Same question in the new report is here; seems like it's from the same data round though? So that's a bit confusing:

There is an additional question, on how this varies for 'primary' ministers vs others on page 77; feels like it should be broken down by religion first, but I haven't looked closely.

Brainstorming things you can do about it:

(US) tell congress you want NSF funding to grow, not cut in half.

(US) tell your state gov to start (resume, really) funding state colleges and growing their research offices.

(World) tell your government to increase research funding and support recruiting efforts. Help people get out and continue to do good work.

(All) consider donations and support for professional societies around academics. (Not just in the US; I suspect strengthening these institutions world wide will help.)

(All) let folks know that the US government is gutting weather reporting, basic research (in basically every field), training for future researchers, and ending experiments that have been running for decades. If there is a cool thing you'd like to see in the future, chances are a republican just broke it.

(Folks with far too much money; kinda shocked you're on here) donate to colleges to create grad student/postdoc/faculty positions. Earmark it carefully so that additional positions are created instead of administrators relabeling previous positions to move money around.

Housing and food for your communities.

I'm going to make a mildly stronger claim. I think this game really is quite moddable by a non-coder. What you need is to implement a different ruleset with new win conditions; everything else can be done with copying existing files into the correct file structure. New win conditions are specified by a pretty boring JSON file, docs here:

https://github.com/yairm210/Unciv/blob/master/docs/Modders/Mod-file-structure/5-Miscellaneous-JSON-files.md#victorytypesjson

See here for an MVP for a mod of this type (probably replaces/strips away too much, but you should be able to find the vanilla files in the github linked in the OP):

https://github.com/yairm210/Unciv-minimal-base-ruleset/tree/master

Which is all to say, this is much easier than doing address lookup imo.

By testing it out in the app?

I've also tried getting AI to program really simple things, like using js to find particular elements in a webpage (which I don't control and involves far too many lines). It did fine.

It's not ready for commercial use, but it makes hacking around unfamiliar code more accessible.

An endorsement for group housing!

While it's got downsides, I'd say the rpg life happens a bit more of you've got 6-8 people living under one roof (or across 6 tents, three neighboring houses, etc)

Kozy asked for a different rule set; essentially changing a few numbers related to non-combat victory (shorter research times, lower policy points required, etc). Identifying these numbers in a complicated code base, especially for a non-programmer, could be very difficult. For the non-programmer, understanding how the code works isn't very important. You just need to know what to change, and perhaps make sure you don't change more.

I think this is exactly a case where getting a novice programming friend to make a mod would make sense. Equivalently, to vibe code.

This is making a classic media literacy mistake.

The argument being made is that we can disregard the source if the thing that the headline is about is a real phenomena, regardless of if the actual anecdote is true. I don't think you can ever disregard the source; we should always ask who told this story and why.

Also, OP definitely made a choice providing this url instead of another. Sensationalist headline? Mistake on their part? Lack of English language alternative?

That sounds like something easily modded; like a couple of integers somewhere. It would be cool to do (and seems vibe-code accessible if a model can hold the full script in context?)

You can be selective with this power; works well for a lot of folks. Have a smallish in group where you're always upstanding, enjoy all the benefits that our tribal brain craves, and also enjoy the material benefits.

Some folks would have easier access to their drugs though. Pre war on drugs might have some benefits

Thank you!

I think it's kinda interesting still, in that it shows people are (must?) drive so much. But yes, agree that per cap seems like the wrong statistic for any kind of safety.

Maybe more fair would be transit fatalities per mile traveled (any method)?

downvoters: is it wrong?

The students read Tolkien, then invent their own settings. The judge thinks this is similar to how claude works. I, nor I suspect the judge, meant that the students were reusing world building whole cloth.