Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AE
Posts
6
Comments
678
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • So you think the punishment for being even remotely associated with the politicians doing that should carry the punishment of a slow and painful death? A lot of fundies don't even fucking vote. I think we need protections against their craziness enshrined in law and anyone directly interfering with someone else's autonomy should be arrested, but mass murder is fucking insane and you know it.

  • There are 309 million possible ways to combine 6 letters. I would wager only a few million are even remotely pronounceable. The notion that someone can claim a bunch of those words and prevent other people from using them, even in unrelated areas, is completely absurd. There are over 8 billion people on this planet, words get reused. They should just fucking deal with it.

  • Eh... Blue light filter reduces image quality. I definitely 100% use it at night, but I'm not sure what benefit there is to using it during the day, especially when 80% of the screen is black or some shade of dark gray most of the time anyway.

  • Piracy can only be considered to be depriving someone of some good if you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the pirate would have paid for access to the content had they not had a pirated copy available. Not only is this not true in the majority of cases, it's also completely impossible to prove in 99.9% of the cases where it is true.

  • Not a lawyer, but most of what you said is true, except:

    then it’s not possible to copy that data without depriving the creator of its value.

    We're talking about the theoretical value the creator might get if you decide to pay for something. If you never had any intention of paying to access something if you couldn't find a pirated copy, no value has been lost by the creator due to copying the data and therefore no harm has been done. The requirement for criminal liability should be that a harm has been inflicted by you beyond any reasonable doubt. Piracy as a deprivation of monetary value can not ever meet this requirement. Of course, the actual requirement is that you have committed a crime beyond reasonable doubt, so if corrupt legislators make piracy a crime, the justice system can obviously charge you with it despite it being victimless, hence the scam.

  • I took it to mean that too and thought it was saying that there was some update that was taking forever. We already got 4 though, so it wouldn't make any sense being posted lately.