Having taught courses on interview techniques, I'd say the quick advice is - remember that for all the questions they ask, they are not primarily interested in you answering the specific question, they are trying to provide an opportunity or a challenge to hear how you fit their idea of a good candidate for the post.
So they don't care about knowing you as a person, they want to hear you're "innovative" or "ambitious" or "compassionate" (depending on the post), with a little anecdote or explanation that shows you understand what that trait means. "I guess some people might call me driven, because from a young age I've always want to be the best at everything. But personally it's not just about being 'ambitious', when I'm passionate about something then I really want to do my best at it, that's why I love learning new approaches and methods to improve my skills, and love working in an industry like ours with so much potential. And from what I understand about your company... " blah blah blah.
It defintely doesn't need to be all bragging and corporate speak (unless that's your work field) but most people do better at interviews once they realise the questions are just the superficial layer, and yoh don't need to worry about them too much. You should answer them (otherwise you seem like you have poor communication skills) but the content of them is just your chance to show off skills and qualities that they want, and to show you understand the job and industry you're in. Having a close read of the job description, company's values and other info should reveal a bunch of target traits that they want to hear about from you.
I sympathise! Meal planning, buying ingredients, realising you messed up and now half your vegetables have rotten, etc is a nightmare. I do envy people who can just get into a routine and eat the same stuff. But I defintely crave variety, and I feel like what I eat each day is probably two thirds of the joy I experience. I'd defintely go without hobbies, activities or possessions to eat slightly nicer food. Eating a nice meal with people you love feels like the pinacle of life experiences for me, and luckily it's one you can do multiple times a day!
I know how it sounds, but it is kinda frustrating (in a #firstworldproblems way). We have the same issue, and there just soemthing that feels like a nice treat about going out to a restaurant, and it kinda spoils it if you feel "meh, it would be been nicer to just eat at home". But overall, defintely happy with the situation!
With the proviso that it depends how you define the scientific method...
One strength is it gives us a reasonably reliable way to investigate and share information, moving slowly forward with problems even though the people working on them might never meet, or even be alive at the same time.
A major downside is that (at least most popular versions of the scientific method) are designed to look at population level tendencies. And depending on the design and scale of these studies it can erase genuine differences. Let say we take a 50 people with skin rashes and give them some antifungal cream. For the vast majority of people this doesn't help, and so our study shows that it's an ineffective treatment for rashes. If we'd found a group of 50 people with rashes caused fungal infection, it would have been a highly effective treatment. So, if that's the extent of our knowledge of rash treatments we would dismiss claims that antifungals "really helped me" as quack anecdotes.
Obviously, this is the process of investigation and refinement that is part of the science. But in the interim period, when working with things that we know we do not fully understand, we have to be careful to not over privilege "scientific evidence". In a relatively new field, if one approach has "good evidence" and others don't, this doesn't mean they are necessarily less effective. They might just be less amenable to experimental designs that allows for their effectiveness to be shown, or they are effective for a specific subgroup that hasn't been clearly identified yet. (obvs, this is not meant to be taken to say any woowoo bullshit 'could' work, but that there's a whole messy middle between those two extremes.)
Yeah, that's my long-term plan. But I can't bring myself to do it right now. I feel like I have a month or whatever without posting, relalise I'm happier without it, I can then close my account. Right now I feels too big a step!
It's actually one of the things I like about lemmy. I don't feel like I get hooked in the same way as other sites, because there's less of an infinite scroll. So getting some advice and entertainment, but not losing 12 hours a day!
And I think getting my partner to have some of my passwords might be a good idea. But it doesn't work for me if it's screen time locks and stuff like that. Last time I tried that (locking with a long unmemorable password and leaving it at home) I just factory reset my device to get it back working....
That's good advice in general, and thanks for saying it? I'm sure some people benefit from that kinda structure. But 'forbid' is sadly not a power I have over myself. And it's not just work time, I've spent hours every morning and night this week, and all day when I'm doing work or just trying to shower or cook food and I'm constantly stopping to check my indox and reply to messages and update my feed. Simple shit that should take ten minutes end up taking an hour because I can't stop getting distracted.
But it's particularly bad combo of stress, adhd, and the addictive design of social networking apps. I can just about manage two of the three, but this week has been real bad.
Yeah, it'd need to be a calendar app that could send a reminder, but not let me see, edit or change that reminder until the set date. Otherwise, I'd just look at the reminder and get the passwords...
Thats cool! I actually have a time lock safe thing, and I do use it to stick my phone away for a few hours sometimes to help focus (I've got adhd, perhaps surprising no-one) but it has a maximum of 24 hours. 365 days is hardcore!
They do displayport over usb c I think. I almost got one a few months ago, or a pixel, but choked at the cost. Ended up with a Motorola Edge 40 and while it's fine, I wish I'd just spent a bit more and got a phone I actually wanted.
Carbonara, because I nearly always have some lardons / bacon in the fridge, and usually have eggs and cheese too. Sauce is ready in the time it takes to cook the pasta, and it feels like a real dinner despite not really needing much prep.
Lazier? Instant noodles, with extra spices and a big spoonful of peanut butter. Makes it richer, creamier and keep nds 'satay' like. Also feels like there's a modicum of nutrional value. If I'm feeling virtuous I'll add some frozen / tinned sweetcorn or peas.
Saw a Ted talk that said the same thing. The guy over came some social anxiety by actively putting himself in an awkward situation each day (his was asking if he could get his coffee for free at the coffee shop). Once he got use to low stakes situations where people were surprised, confused or mildly judgemental (but also amused or just disinterested) it was easier to do things that actually mattered without worrying about people's reactions. And he got a few free coffees.
Wait, you are saying that's something you believed but learned was wrong. You now believe that theory is more valuable than social & practical skills? Or the other way round?
Having taught courses on interview techniques, I'd say the quick advice is - remember that for all the questions they ask, they are not primarily interested in you answering the specific question, they are trying to provide an opportunity or a challenge to hear how you fit their idea of a good candidate for the post.
So they don't care about knowing you as a person, they want to hear you're "innovative" or "ambitious" or "compassionate" (depending on the post), with a little anecdote or explanation that shows you understand what that trait means. "I guess some people might call me driven, because from a young age I've always want to be the best at everything. But personally it's not just about being 'ambitious', when I'm passionate about something then I really want to do my best at it, that's why I love learning new approaches and methods to improve my skills, and love working in an industry like ours with so much potential. And from what I understand about your company... " blah blah blah.
It defintely doesn't need to be all bragging and corporate speak (unless that's your work field) but most people do better at interviews once they realise the questions are just the superficial layer, and yoh don't need to worry about them too much. You should answer them (otherwise you seem like you have poor communication skills) but the content of them is just your chance to show off skills and qualities that they want, and to show you understand the job and industry you're in. Having a close read of the job description, company's values and other info should reveal a bunch of target traits that they want to hear about from you.