Acamon @ Acamon @lemmy.world

Posts

17

Comments

502

Joined

2 yr. ago

Wait, you are saying that's something you believed but learned was wrong. You now believe that theory is more valuable than social & practical skills? Or the other way round?

"gone to" is probably a more accurate translation, because "thither" is such an obscure word in English it gives the wrong impression.

"is curiously missing" could also be replaced with other verbs that capture the unexpected / curious nature of its absence such as "has vanished" or "has disappeared".

If you just want to know, without further investigation, that's going to be very hard. People say a lot of things, and often aren't clear themselves if it's something they actually know, or just something they've heard. All that's happened is that something interesting / helpful has popped into their mind and they've shared it.

If you are willing to discuss it, but don't want to be rude by asking "do you actually know anthing about this?" you can just ask follow up questions, asking for more info / details. That way people who really know can answer, and people who don't will probably just not answer or say that they just read it somewhere (often they're not trying to deceive, just sharing something interesting they heard about).

But as others have said, just be sceptical of stuff you read, especially on the Internet. Lots of people have first had experience of something and still have unhelpful or strange takes on things. People massively over estimate how representative their experiences are, and if you get two experts in a room they'll pretty soon be disagreeing about something they both know throughly.

I was introduced to the "half your age plus seven" as the acceptable minimum age for dating someone, and it does work reasonably well for a good range of ages. But then I found out that it was originally the upper age limit for an acceptable bride...

Yeah, I feel weird about "imposter syndrome" cause sometimes I know I'm genuinely doing a bad job, forgetting important things, or fucking soemthing up and causing me / others a bunch of stress. But I'm also aware that there are somethings I do well, that not everyone else does, but because they're easy for me I don't value them as much as the things I wanted to do right but screwed up anyway.

Something that sometimes helps, and sometimes just disturbs me, is that I think about all my colleagues who are (mostly) "neurotypical" and how often they make stupid mistakes and fuck ups because they are old and computer illiterate, busy with other commitments, slow, or just apathetic. When I spend four hours getting angry at myself until I can manage to finally spend 5 minutes to send an important but straightforward email... Well, it's obvious that I'm useless / terrible. But what the hell are all these other supposedly competent people doing? Because often they're as behind with things as I am. Or doing shit job of a presentation because they can't be bothered rather than because they only have twenty minutes left before the big meeting.

I've never met a bi person who insisted that they're attraction to the genders were equal. Many had preferences (mostly into women, but defintely go with certain guys) and many had phases (more into men today, but was previously crushing hard on that girl). It's one of the commonly talked about sources of bianxiety, that you can go through a period where you start thinking "am I really bi? Maybe I'm just straight / gay" and then you see someone and remember "no, I'm totally bi". Bi erasure is such a thing it even effects bi folks! (source am bi, have lots of bi friends)

The article suggests the February update adds these features. If I check for updates on my pw2 it claims to be up-to-date, with January security updates, and none of those features.

Is this just one of those roll outs where different devices get it at different times? Or is there something I can do to get the latest version. I hate the current app list, felt like a bit step backwards from wear os 3, so I'm glad they've changed it.

Edit: just found that "Tapping the “Your watch is up to date” screen (Settings > System > System updates) multiple times initiates the download". Worked for me after about a dozen taps!

Totally. Seem them everywhere, and they're so cute. Would be great to just munch them, buttered on toast...

In some fantasy, I guess lay lines, dolmens, stone circles and the like are kinda infrastructure for magic? Totally agree about the programming = magic, and in a "fantasy" world I worked on for a game the twist was that all the 'magic' was just programming and hacking the old advanced tech computer / satellite network.

The "mages" had some augmented reality type implant that allowed them to call up minority report style screens they could interact with, and give verbal commands. But to everyone else they're just waving their hands through the air in strange patterns and saying gibberish words "sayday spayis slash eih tay say slash".

The wizards had no real idea what they were doing, and researching new "spells" was basically the same as a noob trying get some feature working on a remote Linux server with only two partial and contradictory walk-throughs for an earlier version of the distro. So even if they got stuff working, they rarely understood how or why it worked.

I think it's really interesting to think about how even though computing is generally objective / logical, if you stripped away all background knowledge and added in a bunch of uncertainty (it's hard to communicate with the server and sometimes your commands get scrambled, so even the same command might not always work) then you'd end up in a situation quite like ancient / medieval science where people hyothosise about principles and make systems that are helpful, but don't actually align to what's really happening.

Totally. I was just being descriptive not prescriptive. I wasn't aware of the sub, and thought this was a fun lemmy thing, particularly suited to its smaller user base. And I've always associated asklemmy / askreddit with asking people's opinions, wanting a broad range of answers.

Looking at the guidelines, there doesn't seem to be any guidance about what kinds of questions beyond "ask away". The rules are mostly about no trolling, NSFW, etc. So, my comment was giving the perspective of someone who didn't associate the community with a reddit thing, and the message it's giving off is "ask any question" and that seemed cool to me. But I have no problem at all with it being more specific than that, having explicit guidelines or just a culture of up/down certain types of questions. Community guidelines and specialisation are good! But with lemmy smaller user base more broad communities can also be good!

I think most people don't like to see obviously leading/rhetorical questions, but I'm (personally) happy with seeing more abstract, whimsical, or interesting questions than just "stuff you feel like you should know but don't ". Looking at the top posts in the community, there are some "what is wage theft/a sovereign citizens/etc" which seem to be the classic "everyone else seems to know something I don't" situation. Then there's a bunch of fediverse, corporation and tech industry opinion questions, which definitely do seem more like an asklemmy thing. But "can you live on pickles?" or "would nuclear weapons be useful in a space battle" are the kinda questions I think are fun and I generally enjoy reading the responses and learn something, but they're not "stuffy you should be expected to know" (well, maybe the pickles answer is pretty obvious, but the reasoning isn't necessarily...)

Ah, I wasn't familiar with the subreddit, so I was just taking it as a free for all, so no question is out of place. Especially as lemmy is smaller, and lacks enough traffic in niche communities, it makes sense to have a bigger community for just answering whatever comes to mind.

But obviously there's issues with that, if the community was swamped it would make sense to have a stricter guideline.

Yeah, growing up before digital photography was common, loads of people hated how they looked in photographs. When you only saw a couple of photos of yourself in a year, it was really easy to be horrified and ask "is that really what I look like". Now you can take ten selfies in a row and you know that how you look varies massively depending on the angle or lighting. And anyone who has to regularly work with their own recorded voice generally gets over the cringe pretty quickly.

That's exactly it. I think one of the reason many people who struggle with small talk is because they take these conversations at face value. It doesn't matter if you don't care about how their family is doing, you're not asking because you want the information. You're asking because the question itself means "I respect you as a peer and am showing interest in you".

And it's also why the answers don't generally matter. They don't care what you're really doing for your holidays, just give a simple but positive response "just looking forward to getting some rest!", "going to see my family". If you show you're interested in them, and you respond to their questions that's enough for most people. Even if those questions and answers are completely vacuous.

That's really helpful! Exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. I wasn't aware of the role of temperature and embedding, thet explain a lot.

That's my take as well, I would just like to know more about the weighting/bias.

Just to make clear because it seems to come up a lot in some responses - I absolutely don't think (and never have) that chatgpt is intelligent, 'understands' what I'm saying to it or what it's saying to me (let alone is accurate!). Older chat bots were very prone to getting in weird loops, or sudden context/topic switches. Chatgpt doesn't do this very often, and I was wondering what the mechanism for keeping it's answers plausibly connected to the topic under discussion and avoiding grammatical cul-de-sacs.

I know it's just a model, I want to understand the difference between it's predictions and the predictions on my Android keyboard. Is it simply considering the entire previous text as it makes its predictions vs just the last few words? Why doesn't it occasionally respond with a hundred thousand word response? Many of the texts it's trained on are longer than it's usual responses. There seems to be some limits and guidance given either through its training data or its response training that guide it beyond "based on the texts I have seen, what is the most likely word." and I was curious if there was a summary what the blend of corpus based prediction and respinse feedback, etc. has been used.

Drunkly got down to it on a very empty train... But someone saw us cause the police were waiting for us at the station. Fortunately there was no cameras where we were, and no corroborating evidence, so we got away with it. But both of us had to go to the station and get questioned... Definte drunken stupidity, and now we're a bit more circumspect.

Yeah, I'd say SO generally are like great friends (with benefits), but often, over time you end up doing so much stuff with them that they eclipse any other individual friend. And eventually (especially if you end up living together) they become such a part of your day to day life they can begin to feel like an extension of yourself (or rather, that you're both part of one being) and it's hard to live with out them. I remember laughing at my dad for wanting to phone my mum everyday when he was away on business. I'd be like "what do you even have to talk about? You see each other all the time" But now, if I had a day where I didn't at least message with my partner I'd feel so isolated.

Ereaders like kobo / kindle have gentle backlight, just make sure you get one with adjustable warm /cool white backlight, so you can make it warm and not blue. I also use a little clip on booklight with adjustable brightness and color. If it's dim and red/orange you're not disturbing anyone but it illuminates the page perfectly.