XIIIesq @ 13esq @lemmy.world

Posts

12

Comments

940

Joined

2 yr. ago

I honestly wouldn't care if he wasn't applying for what is arguably the most important job in the world and I think the "still better than Trump" argument is just setting an extremely low bar.

I don't think knowing the difference between Zelensky and Putin is a big ask.

I'm pretty sure it was on Reddit at some point but I'm not saying that makes it any more trustworthy.

There is no knowing or feedback.

Mutations are random and there are many more failed mutations than successful ones.

You only see the successful species for that very reason, the failed ones have not been able to compete or pass their genes on at an appropriate rate.

If she wanted to be found, being white and rich would've helped.

It's a sensitive topic but white and black people are genetically much more seperated than black and white rhinos which we are happy to describe as separate species.

The term isn't outdated because it's incorrect, it's outdated because if you start saying different groups of humans are literally separate species it really feeds in to the racist agenda.

Edit: Given the replies, it appears that I may well be wrong, I remember reading it somewhere but I can't find the source nkw. I'll downvote myself but leave the comment up because it enables others to learn from my mistake

That's already the option. I truly think that the democrats can find a better candidate.

"but Trump's a raving lunatic!" Sticks fingers firmly in ears

Edit: presumably I'm getting downvoted because Trump has set the bar so low that we're ingnoring the common opinion that Biden should retire gracefully rather than acting surprised when Trump wins and getting forced out anyway.

You're not applying for the arguably the most important job in the world. I think "better than Trump tho" is an extremely low bar and actually rather depressing.

Lemmy: "Trumps a raving lunatic so let's pretend this is OK and that this is the best candidate that the party can put forward".

Trump being a raving lunatic doesn't make it OK to not find a candidate that doesn't belong in a care home.

And the democrats can't produce a candidate that's not gaff prone? What a sorry state of affairs.

You're also not applying for arguably the most important job in the world.

Copium. I hate Trump but this is absolute basics when it comes to world politics.

It was a huge gaff.

We did it, Reddit!

Definitely not a tube amp. A tube amp usually has only one or two tubes. This number of tubes implies that they are being used as primitive transistors for logic functions, you can also see a number display made from nixie tubes at the top of the image.

Google image search says it's a desk calculator with electron tubes.

https://www.technikum29.de/en/computer/electron-tubes.php

Feasible in cities and large towns (if they have a reliable public transport infrastructure), not really feasible anywhere else.

I know I'm being pedantic but murder requires intent, it seems that the majority of these cases are manslaughter, still illegal though and just as sad.

We need to keep in mind that this was an anti-tory vote, not a pro-labour one. This is shown by labour only increasing their vote share by 1.6% when compared with the previous election.

Labour need to ensure that they've made positive changes that the average person can feel by the time the next election comes around because you can guarantee that the Tories are already planning on how they're going to mop up the reform voters.

Standing against a guy that's a raving lunatic doesn't make it OK to be senile. Hilary was a shit candidate and look what that got us.