Strawberries are nuts 🍓

Strawberry seeds are designed by a malevolent god to stick perfectly in human front teeth.

Raspberry seeds make fun of strawberry seeds.
- I have a chia seed from 1973 in the back of my mouth.
They are made to stay a long time in hosts so that they can spread farther

strawberries are accessory fruits, not nuts.

But they're covered in nuts
- Kinda like your mom last night
...which is exactly what the third comment is saying
- If you took all the seeds off a strawberry, it'd still be a strawberry. A bowl full of strawberry seeds is not a bowl of strawberries.
  e: They're actually not even nuts. They're achenes.

Achenes are not nuts.

(1) Achene. A small hard indehiscent fruit. The term is strictly only applied to those formed from one carpel, but is sometimes used for those formed from two carpels (e.g. the fruit of the Compositae). The latter is better termed a cypsela.

(2) Nut. This is similar to an achene, but is typically formed from two or three carpels (e.g. dock fruit).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/achene

i. Achene - A one-seeded, dry, indehiscent fruit; the one seed is attached to the fruit wall at a single point.

ii. Nut - A dry, indehiscent, one seeded fruit similar to an achene but with the wall greatly thickened and hardened.

https://courses.botany.wisc.edu/botany_400/Lab/LabWK03Fruitkey.html

Also, even if they were, it wouldn't make the strawberry a nut. It would make it covered in nuts.
Thank you! 👏
The term is strictly only applied to those formed from one carpel, but is sometimes used for those formed from two carpels
It is strictly only applied to ones with one carpel, but is used anyway to refer to ones with two carpels? That's not confusing at all

Why is microsoft from Germany writing in English? Why don't they just post it on their main Account which actually has a primarely English-speaking audience?

The original post (not shown in the screenshot) is from PBS, that’s why it says “Author” by their name. If it was in English (likely) it makes sense to answer in English as well.
- Ok, the original post by PBS is just cropped out, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation

To me arguing over which fruit belongs in which category is a prime example of people arguing over shadows in Plato's cave. Not that it's a waste of time or anything but sometimes people act like tomatoes won't grow if you call them vegetables. Like at the end of the day it's just humans developing a system to make sense of nature rather than discovering an inherent, pre-existing system.

Like at the end of the day it’s just humans developing a system to make sense of nature
The core of the matter is that we have multiple, mutually incompatible schemes sharing in part the same terminology. Biology is not cooking, both fields care about vastly different things thus the categorisation scheme is different, that's the end of it. Culinarily, tomatoes have too much umami to be fruit. Botanically peppermint is an aromatic, I recommend you not put any into your soffritto.
EDIT:
Tomato is also dominated by oxalic acid, not malic, citric, (typical fruit acids) or acetic (fermented/overripe). Oxalic acid is in parsley, chives, spinach, beans, lettuce, that kind of stuff. "It's sour" isn't sufficient to describe a taste profile, our tongues may not tell them apart but our noses definitely do.
I think it should be possible to break the culinary categorisation down to chemistry. That doesn't tell you anything about the "why" but it's definitely not random and definitely not all in our heads.
- Oh, this is actually a perfect example of the arbitreity of mapping systems!
  A looong time ago on reddit, I got into an argument with someone who was doing that thing where you confuse the map for the object itself. We were mostly talking about the chemistry table. But anyway, he just could not see how a change in motivation, that is what the map designer finds useful, could change how the map is arranged.
  I mean, I don't think this would convince him: he would just say the culinary version isn't real. But still, I really like it.
- I think it should be possible to break the culinary categorisation down to chemistry. That doesn't tell you anything about the "why" but it's definitely not random and definitely not all in our heads.
  I agree with what you mean in kind of a broad-strokes way, but as individuals our subjective experiences of flavors can vary pretty wildly. There's genetics, neurology, age, and habit/experience that influence our taste in terms of actually sensing the chemicals. Then there's what we see, taste, and smell just prior or during tasting that severely impact our interpretation of that chemical sense.
- You never had tomato pie? It would likely change your idea of what too much savoriness is.
- "Botanically" "culinary" "terminology" "biology" and then you say umami seriously. Which is entirely made up.
I totally agree. It is completely nonsense to say. In other languages it is different. I just know some Spanish, but they don't have a word for berries or nuts, it is all just fruit. (Forrest fruit for berries or dried fruit for nuts) but they don't call potatoes vegetables, but "tuberculo". Interesting difference, which i guess is because they have another climate and other plants.
We do just call it a vegetable in my language.
- Bayas y nueces... Tubérculo is closer to the botanical definition because it is a tuber (storage organ) and not a fruit (like most vegetables). And I would think that tubérculo could be any tuber vegetable, not just papas/patatas. Things like ñame or otoe are called tubérculo también.
Technically, the pre-existing system could be evolutionary biology. I'm just saying that in some cases, a little bit of pedantry is enjoyable. It's an acquired taste, maybe

I've heard every combination of "[food] is actually [plant part]" so any time anyone says this type of sentence, I just roll my eyes.

Cabbages are actually tree trunks
Raspberries are actually tubers
Wheat is actually a berry
And oranges are actually an eldritch, ante-dimensional horror perpetrated by intelligent, unseen beings
Also acorns are the progenitors of oranges.
- Potatoes
  are actually an eldritch, ante-dimensional horror perpetrated by intelligent, unseen beings
  too.
Yeah it's just meaningless factoids to me now.

I want to fill a spoon with strawberry seeds and see how it tastes

You gotta shell them first.

So what this nerd is saying is that we can milk a strawberry??

Before the tech gets there, let's commission some "art" on that subject?

(For real, the seeds being nuts is a stretch)

Strawberries do not have nipples. :(
- Ofc not, don't be silly.
  Nuts have nipples (where do you think almond milk comes from? Kids today have prob never seen an almond on a farm & think almond milk grows in the stores!).
  And if the seeds on the strawberries really are "nuts", then we should be able to milk them.
  \ I see no flaw in my logic.
- Strawberry cows
- If strawberries do not have nipples, then where does strawberry milk come from?

Like cashews!

I thought nuts had to come from trees, though.

Like, peanuts aren't actually nuts.

There's a legumes joke in there, but I dunno.
- Peanuts claim to be nuts, but they aren't a legumtimate part of the taxonomy.
  I dunno.
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding your post, but cashews are drupes, not nuts. I don't know whether all true nuts come from trees, but all the ones I can think of do.
- If strawberries are nuts, cashews are nuts. It's a seed that grows on the outside of an accessory fruit.
  Obviously strawberries aren't nuts either but we're playing pretty fast and loose with words and meanings.
What is a tree?
- Although "tree" is a common word, there is no universally recognised precise definition of what a tree is, either botanically or in common language.[1][2] In its broadest sense, a tree is any plant with the general form of an elongated stem, or trunk, which supports the photosynthetic leaves or branches at some distance above the ground.
  Well damn, I guess strawberries can be trees and nuts.

You need to put an exclamation mark (!) before you insert the image, like this:
![](https://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/20111228.gif)
- Thanks. I don't comment much anymore.

While peanuts are not nuts, but legumes.

I hereby christen thee, pealegumes.

Is this why strawberries are common allergens? Like so much more common than other fruits?

No, this post is not even accurate.
The substance in strawberries which causes allergic reactions is the fra a 1 protein which gives strawberries their red color. White strawberries have less of this protein and may be tolerated by people with this allergy, depending on individual sensitivity.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996917304209

Like cashews?

This is nuts!

Strawberry nut flour - it's gluten free!

Microsoft feigning innocence with cutesy trivia to distract us from their highly unethical business practices. Screw Microsoft. Use Linux 🐧.

- -
✍︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

I wonder if people are allergic to strawberries are just allergic to the seeds then

Smelling roses has always reminded me of strawberries, although people think that's strange. Taste and smell are connected and this explains it.